Suppr超能文献

高解离体验和低解离体验受试者在催眠前和催眠期间的脑电图振荡

Electroencephalography Oscillations During Prehypnosis and Hypnosis in Subjects With High and Low Dissociative Experiences.

作者信息

Taghilou Hoda, Rezaei Mazaher, Nazari Mohammad Ali, Valizadeh Alireza

机构信息

Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Medicine, Beheshti Hospital, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.

出版信息

Basic Clin Neurosci. 2025;16(Spec Issue):367-378. doi: 10.32598/bcn.2023.1206.2. Epub 2025 Mar 18.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Hypnosis is a multifaceted phenomenon that refers to suggestions for creating desirable behavior, experience, and physiological changes. Most electroencephalographic (EEG) research in hypnosis has allocated people into two groups of high and low hypnotizables. Hence, the empirical data are somewhat controversial, and there is no general agreement about the neurophysiology of hypnosis. On the other hand, the dissociation theory of hypnosis posits that people candidates for hypnosis are typically prone to dissociation, and individuals divide into two groups: High dissociative (HD) and low dissociative (LD). If this assumption is true, such a state should be visible as a distinct pattern of changes in absolute power and functional connectivity between brain districts after a hypnotic induction in high but not in LD suggestible.

METHODS

The final sample consisted of 20 participants who scored 6 or higher on the Stanford hypnotic susceptibility scale form C (SHSS: C). Then, we completed dissociative experiences scales (DES) on them. To assess the brain's electrical activity during hypnosis, a 19-channel EEG was recorded from 10 HD and 10 LD participants with their eyes closed before (baseline) and after the induction of hypnosis. We used EEG to measure absolute power and functional connectivity using coherence. We expected the two groups to have dissimilar EEG signal patterns despite equivalent hypnotizability.

RESULTS

We found that in the delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma bands, both groups were different from the baseline to hypnosis. In addition, both groups showed different connectivity in hypnosis in four bands (delta, theta, alpha, and beta).

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate that although the LD and HD groups had equal hypnotizability, the episodic prospection tasks did not involve the same neural networks in the two groups.

摘要

引言

催眠是一种多方面的现象,指的是用于产生期望的行为、体验和生理变化的暗示。大多数关于催眠的脑电图(EEG)研究将人们分为高催眠易感性和低催眠易感性两组。因此,实证数据存在一定争议,关于催眠的神经生理学也没有普遍共识。另一方面,催眠的解离理论认为,催眠候选者通常易于解离,个体分为两组:高解离性(HD)和低解离性(LD)。如果这一假设成立,那么在高催眠易感性但非低催眠易感性个体中,催眠诱导后大脑区域之间的绝对功率和功能连接的明显变化模式应该能够体现出这种状态。

方法

最终样本由20名在斯坦福催眠易感性量表C型(SHSS:C)上得分6分或更高的参与者组成。然后,我们对他们进行了解离体验量表(DES)测试。为了评估催眠期间大脑的电活动,在10名高解离性和10名低解离性参与者闭眼状态下,于催眠诱导前(基线)和诱导后记录了19通道脑电图。我们使用脑电图通过相干性来测量绝对功率和功能连接。我们预期尽管两组催眠易感性相当,但脑电图信号模式会有所不同。

结果

我们发现,在δ、θ、α、β和γ频段,两组从基线到催眠状态均有差异。此外,两组在催眠状态下的四个频段(δ、θ、α和β)均显示出不同的连接性。

结论

这些发现表明,尽管低解离性和高解离性两组的催眠易感性相同,但情景前瞻性任务在两组中涉及的神经网络并不相同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/630a/12265433/f7b3ef612999/BCN-16-367-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验