Suppr超能文献

双相 I 型和 II 型障碍中的催眠易感性和情感状态。

Hypnotic susceptibility and affective states in bipolar I and II disorders.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry/ School of Public Health, Zhejiang University College of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310058, China.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Nov 9;17(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1529-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Highly hypnotizable individuals have impaired executive function, elevated motor impulsivity and increased emotional sensitivity, which are sometimes found in bipolar disorder patients. It is then reasonable to assume that certain aspects of hypnotic susceptibility differ with the types of bipolar disorder.

METHODS

The Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale: Form C (SHSS:C) test, the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ), the Hypomanic Checklist-32 (HCL-32) and the Plutchick-van Praag Depression Inventory (PVP) were applied to 62 patients with bipolar I disorder, 33 bipolar II disorder, and 120 healthy volunteers.

RESULTS

The passing rate of the SHSS:C 'Moving hands apart' item was higher in bipolar I patients than in controls, whereas for 'Mosquito hallucination' the rate was lower. Bipolar I and II patients scored significantly higher on MDQ, HCL-32 and PVP scales than controls. The passing rates of 'Mosquito hallucination' in controls, 'Arm rigidity' in bipolar I, and 'Age regression' in bipolar II predicted the respective MDQ scores.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to cognitive suggestions, bipolar I patients followed motor suggestions more often under hypnosis. Furthermore, both bipolar disorder patients and healthy volunteers demonstrated associations between mania levels and certain hypnotic susceptibility features. Our study aids in better understanding the altered conscious states in bipolar disorders, and encourages the use of related psychotherapy for these patients.

摘要

背景

高度催眠易感性个体的执行功能受损,运动冲动性升高,情绪敏感性增强,这些在双相情感障碍患者中有时会被发现。因此,可以合理地假设催眠易感性的某些方面因双相情感障碍的类型而异。

方法

采用斯坦福催眠易感性量表 C 式(SHSS:C)测试、心境障碍问卷(MDQ)、躁狂检查表-32(HCL-32)和普卢特尼克-范普拉格抑郁量表(PVP)对 62 例双相 I 型障碍患者、33 例双相 II 型障碍患者和 120 名健康志愿者进行了评估。

结果

双相 I 型障碍患者通过 SHSS:C“分开手”项目的通过率高于对照组,而通过“蚊虫幻觉”项目的通过率则较低。双相 I 型和 II 型障碍患者在 MDQ、HCL-32 和 PVP 量表上的得分显著高于对照组。对照组的“蚊虫幻觉”通过率、双相 I 型的“手臂僵直”通过率和双相 II 型的“年龄倒退”通过率预测了各自的 MDQ 得分。

结论

与认知暗示相反,双相 I 型障碍患者在催眠下更常遵循运动暗示。此外,双相情感障碍患者和健康志愿者均显示出躁狂水平与某些催眠易感性特征之间存在关联。我们的研究有助于更好地理解双相情感障碍中的改变意识状态,并鼓励对这些患者使用相关的心理治疗。

相似文献

10
Mood swings in patients with panic disorder.
Can J Psychiatry. 1994 Mar;39(2):91-4. doi: 10.1177/070674379403900205.

本文引用的文献

2
Metacognition of agency is reduced in high hypnotic suggestibility.自我归因认知能力在高度催眠暗示性中降低。
Cognition. 2017 Nov;168:176-181. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.026. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
3
The Prefrontal Cortex and Suggestion: Hypnosis vs. Placebo Effects.前额叶皮层与暗示:催眠与安慰剂效应
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 30;7:415. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00415. eCollection 2016.
4
Cognitive Hypnotherapy as a Transdiagnostic Protocol for Emotional Disorders.
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2016;64(2):147-66. doi: 10.1080/00207144.2016.1131585.
10
Impulsivity, self-control, and hypnotic suggestibility.冲动性、自我控制和催眠暗示性。
Conscious Cogn. 2013 Jun;22(2):637-53. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.001. Epub 2013 May 7.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验