Suppr超能文献

[Comparison between the AMDP system and other standardized systems and multifactorial scales for the evaluation of psychopathology (author's transl)].

作者信息

Bobon D P

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Belg. 1978 Jul-Aug;78(4):559-72.

PMID:102113
Abstract

The author compares the advantages and disadvantages of psychiatric documentation and rating systems (the AMDP and MSIS systems), and of major multiphasic rating scales (the CPRS, IMPS, PSE, SCI and WPRS scales). He briefly describes the history and content of the AMDP System, formerly known as AMP. This standardized system of alemanic origin is presently adapted or being adapted in nine languages (Croatian, English, Esthonian, French, Italian, Japanese, Portugese, Russian and Spanish). Of the four forms, only the two forms designed for the quantitative assessment of pychopathological and somatic symptoms have been included in the first edition of the French adaptation (1978). Similarities and dissimilarities between the German system and its first French adaptation are discussed.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验