Shea J A, Kletke P R, Wozniak G D, Polsky D, Escarce J J
Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Med Care. 1999 Apr;37(4):333-8. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199904000-00003.
Many internal medicine physicians report both primary and secondary specialties in the American Medical Association (AMA) Physician Masterfile. Usually, those represent combinations of general internal medicine and medical subspecialty practice. Whether reported specialty combinations can be used to assess the contribution of specialists to primary care is unknown.
To examine whether internists' primary and secondary specialties reported in the Masterfile reflect the amount of primary care that they provide, and whether changes over time in internists' reported specialties reflect changes in primary care provision.
The Masterfile was used to identify internists' reported specialties in 1992 and in 1996. A mail questionnaire was used to assess the primary care content of physicians' practices. The association between reported specialties and the amount of primary care provided was evaluated using analysis of variance.
A stratified random sample of internists in active clinical practice.
The percentage of visits which were for the general medical care of patients for whom the physicians maintained ongoing responsibility. In addition, how often the physicians initiated the provision of preventive care for their regular patients, provided general medical care to these patients, and organized and coordinated the care received by these patients from other providers.
There was a strong association between the internists' primary and secondary specialties reported in the Masterfile and measures of the primary care content of physicians' practices (P < 0.0001). In contrast, changes over time in internists' reported specialties were not associated with physicians' assessments of changes in the primary care content of their practices.
Aggregate estimates of the availability of primary care in the US could be adjusted by taking into account the primary and secondary specialties reported by internal medicine physicians in the AMA Physician Masterfile.
许多内科医生在美国医学协会(AMA)医师主文件中报告了主要和次要专业。通常,这些代表普通内科和医学亚专业实践的组合。报告的专业组合是否可用于评估专科医生对初级保健的贡献尚不清楚。
研究主文件中报告的内科医生的主要和次要专业是否反映了他们提供的初级保健量,以及内科医生报告的专业随时间的变化是否反映了初级保健提供的变化。
使用主文件确定1992年和1996年内科医生报告的专业。通过邮寄问卷来评估医生实践中的初级保健内容。使用方差分析评估报告的专业与提供的初级保健量之间的关联。
活跃临床实践中的内科医生分层随机样本。
医生持续负责的患者接受普通医疗护理的就诊百分比。此外,医生为其常规患者启动预防性护理、为这些患者提供普通医疗护理以及组织和协调这些患者从其他提供者处接受的护理的频率。
主文件中报告的内科医生的主要和次要专业与医生实践中初级保健内容的测量之间存在很强的关联(P < 0.0001)。相比之下,内科医生报告的专业随时间的变化与医生对其实践中初级保健内容变化的评估无关。
考虑到AMA医师主文件中内科医生报告的主要和次要专业,可以调整美国初级保健可及性的总体估计。