Kulkarni Vivek T, Ross Joseph S, Wang Yongfei, Nallamothu Brahmajee K, Spertus John A, Normand Sharon-Lise T, Masoudi Frederick A, Krumholz Harlan M
Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 May 1;6(3):352-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000214. Epub 2013 May 16.
Cardiologists are distributed unevenly across regions of the United States. It is unknown whether patients in regions with fewer cardiologists have worse outcomes after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or heart failure (HF).
Using Medicare administrative claims data from 2010, we examined the relationship between regional density of cardiologists and risk of death after hospitalization for AMI and HF using hospitalizations for pneumonia as a comparison. We defined density as the number of cardiologists divided by population aged≥65 years within hospital referral regions, categorized into quintiles. Among 171 126 admissions for AMI, 352 853 admissions for HF, and 343 053 admissions for pneumonia, we tested associations between density of cardiologists and 30-day and 1-year mortality for each condition. We used 2-level hierarchical logistic regression models that adjusted for characteristics of patients and hospital referral regions. Patients hospitalized for AMI (odds ratios [OR], 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.21) and HF (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.12-1.27) in the lowest quintile of density had modestly higher 30-day mortality risk compared with patients in the highest quintile, unlike patients hospitalized for pneumonia (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.96-1.09). Patients hospitalized for AMI (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.00-1.12) and HF (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04-1.13) in the lowest quintile had slightly higher 1-year mortality risk, unlike patients hospitalized for pneumonia (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.95-1.05).
Patients hospitalized for AMI and HF in regions with a low density of cardiologists experienced modestly higher 30-day and 1-year mortality risk, unlike patients with pneumonia.
美国心脏病专家在各地区分布不均。急性心肌梗死(AMI)或心力衰竭(HF)住院治疗后,心脏病专家较少地区的患者预后是否较差尚不清楚。
利用2010年医疗保险行政索赔数据,我们以肺炎住院患者作为对照,研究了心脏病专家的区域密度与AMI和HF住院后死亡风险之间的关系。我们将密度定义为心脏病专家人数除以医院转诊区域内年龄≥65岁的人口数,并分为五等份。在171126例AMI住院患者、352853例HF住院患者和343053例肺炎住院患者中,我们测试了每种疾病的心脏病专家密度与30天和1年死亡率之间的关联。我们使用了两级分层逻辑回归模型,对患者和医院转诊区域的特征进行了调整。与最高五分之一密度区域的患者相比,最低五分之一密度区域的AMI住院患者(比值比[OR],1.13;95%置信区间[CI],1.06 - 1.21)和HF住院患者(OR,1.19;95% CI,1.12 - 1.27)30天死亡风险略高,而肺炎住院患者则不同(OR,1.02;95% CI,0.96 - 1.09)。最低五分之一密度区域的AMI住院患者(OR,1.06;95% CI,1.00 - 1.12)和HF住院患者(OR,1.09;95% CI,1.04 - 1.13)1年死亡风险略高,而肺炎住院患者则不同(OR,1.00;95% CI,0.95 - 1.05)。
与肺炎患者不同,心脏病专家密度低的地区,AMI和HF住院患者经历的30天和1年死亡风险略高。