• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于平板电脑的一般认知能力评估组合的开发与验证

The development and validation of a tablet-based assessment battery of general cognitive ability.

作者信息

Pan Dong-Ni, Xie Hailun, Zeng Yanjia, Zhou Yixiang, Lin Cuizhu, Ma Xin, Ren Juejing, Jiao Yuanyun, Wu Yingying, Wei Wei, Xue Gui

机构信息

School of Psychology, Beijing Language and Culture University, Beijing, 100083, China.

Beijing Infinite Brain Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, 100022, PR China.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2024 Dec 24;12(1):778. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02283-7.

DOI:10.1186/s40359-024-02283-7
PMID:39719650
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11669203/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traditional cognitive assessments, often reliant on paper-and-pencil tests and professional evaluators, suffer from subjectivity and limited result discrimination. This study introduces the Baguan Online Cognitive Assessment System (BOCAS), a tablet-based system that evaluates both general cognitive ability (GCA) and domain-specific functions across six domains: sensory-motor skills, processing speed, sustained attention, working memory, cognitive flexibility, and spatial ability.

METHODS

BOCAS was validated with 151 healthy Chinese adults aged 18-40. Reliability was assessed through internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to validate the model. The GCA score was correlated with the Raven IQ test and self-reported cognitive flexibility, and its relationship with negative emotions (depression and anxiety) was examined.

RESULTS

BOCAS showed satisfactory reliability, with internal consistency ranging from 0.712 to 0.846 and test-retest reliability from 0.56 to 0.71. Factor analysis revealed a common factor explaining 40% of the variance, and CFA indicated a good model fit (χ²/df = 1.81; CFI = 0.932). The GCA score strongly correlated with the Raven IQ test (r = 0.58) and was related to self-reported cognitive flexibility and negative emotions.

CONCLUSION

BOCAS offers a digital solution for cognitive assessment, providing automated, remote, and precise evaluations. It demonstrates reliability, validity, and potential for use in clinical and research settings.

摘要

背景

传统的认知评估通常依赖纸笔测试和专业评估人员,存在主观性且结果区分能力有限。本研究引入了八观在线认知评估系统(BOCAS),这是一种基于平板电脑的系统,可评估一般认知能力(GCA)以及六个领域的特定领域功能:感觉运动技能、处理速度、持续注意力、工作记忆、认知灵活性和空间能力。

方法

BOCAS在151名年龄在18至40岁之间的健康中国成年人中进行了验证。通过内部一致性和重测信度评估可靠性。使用因子分析和验证性因子分析(CFA)来验证模型。将GCA分数与瑞文智商测试以及自我报告的认知灵活性相关联,并检验其与负面情绪(抑郁和焦虑)的关系。

结果

BOCAS显示出令人满意的可靠性,内部一致性范围为0.712至0.846,重测信度为0.56至0.71。因子分析揭示了一个共同因子,解释了40%的方差,CFA表明模型拟合良好(χ²/df = 1.81;CFI = 0.932)。GCA分数与瑞文智商测试高度相关(r = 0.58),并与自我报告的认知灵活性和负面情绪有关。

结论

BOCAS为认知评估提供了一种数字解决方案,提供自动化、远程和精确的评估。它展示了在临床和研究环境中使用的可靠性、有效性和潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5896/11669203/56b0f74cf917/40359_2024_2283_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5896/11669203/11e6b44121cb/40359_2024_2283_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5896/11669203/56b0f74cf917/40359_2024_2283_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5896/11669203/11e6b44121cb/40359_2024_2283_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5896/11669203/56b0f74cf917/40359_2024_2283_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The development and validation of a tablet-based assessment battery of general cognitive ability.基于平板电脑的一般认知能力评估组合的开发与验证
BMC Psychol. 2024 Dec 24;12(1):778. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02283-7.
2
Test-retest reliability, practice effects and estimates of change: A study on the Mindmore digital cognitive assessment tool.重测信度、练习效应及变化估计:关于Mindmore数字认知评估工具的一项研究。
Scand J Psychol. 2025 Feb;66(1):1-14. doi: 10.1111/sjop.13054. Epub 2024 Jul 28.
3
A New Smartphone-Based Cognitive Screening Battery for Multiple Sclerosis (icognition): Validation Study.一种基于智能手机的新型多发性硬化症认知筛查组合测试(icognition):验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 20;27:e53503. doi: 10.2196/53503.
4
[Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)].[一种用于评估精神分裂症认知功能的新工具的价值:精神分裂症认知功能简短评估量表(BACS)]
Encephale. 2008 Dec;34(6):557-62. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
5
A Validation Study of the Inbrain CST: a Tablet Computer-based Cognitive Screening Test for Elderly People with Cognitive Impairment.脑内皮质脊髓束验证研究:一种基于平板电脑的认知障碍老年人认知筛查测试
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Aug 31;35(34):e292. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e292.
6
The Chinese Version of the DigiHealthCom (Digital Health Competence) Instrument for Assessing Digital Health Competence of Health Care Professionals: Translation, Adaptation, and Validation Study.用于评估医疗保健专业人员数字健康能力的DigiHealthCom(数字健康能力)工具中文版:翻译、改编与验证研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Mar 21;12:e65373. doi: 10.2196/65373.
7
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Spanish Validation of the Computerized Information Processing Assessment Battery (COGNITO).计算机化信息处理评估量表(COGNITO)的跨文化适应与西班牙语版验证
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2025 Apr 27;40(3):591-603. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acad075.
8
Reliability and validity of a self-administered tool for online neuropsychological testing: The Amsterdam Cognition Scan.一种用于在线神经心理学测试的自施工具的信度和效度:阿姆斯特丹认知扫描。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2018 Apr;40(3):253-273. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2017.1339017. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
9
Latent factor structure of the Das-Naglieri Cognitive Assessment System: a confirmatory factor analysis in a Chinese setting.《Das-Naglieri 认知评估系统的潜在因子结构:中国情境下的验证性因子分析》。
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Sep-Oct;32(5):1988-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.04.005. Epub 2011 May 14.
10
Validation of the tablet-administered Brief Assessment of Cognition (BAC App).片剂给药的简易认知评估(BAC应用程序)的验证
Schizophr Res. 2017 Mar;181:100-106. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.10.010. Epub 2016 Oct 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Remote Assessment: Origins, Benefits, and Concerns.远程评估:起源、益处与担忧
J Intell. 2023 Jun 9;11(6):114. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11060114.
2
Exploring the Relationship between Cognitive Ability Tilt and Job Performance.探索认知能力倾斜与工作绩效之间的关系。
J Intell. 2023 Feb 23;11(3):44. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11030044.
3
Game based assessments of cognitive ability in recruitment: Validity, fairness and test-taking experience.招聘中基于游戏的认知能力评估:效度、公平性与应试体验。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 18;13:942662. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.942662. eCollection 2022.
4
Tapping on a target: dealing with uncertainty about its position and motion.敲击目标:处理关于其位置和运动的不确定性。
Exp Brain Res. 2023 Jan;241(1):81-104. doi: 10.1007/s00221-022-06503-7. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
5
A cognitive neurogenetic approach to uncovering the structure of executive functions.采用认知神经遗传学方法揭示执行功能的结构。
Nat Commun. 2022 Aug 6;13(1):4588. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32383-0.
6
Cognitive impairment in people with schizophrenia: an umbrella review.精神分裂症患者的认知障碍:伞式综述。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2022 Oct;272(7):1139-1155. doi: 10.1007/s00406-022-01416-6. Epub 2022 May 28.
7
Cross-cultural differences in visuo-spatial processing and the culture-fairness of visuo-spatial intelligence tests: an integrative review and a model for matrices tasks.跨文化视空间加工差异及视空间智力测验的文化公平性:综合述评及矩阵任务模型
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Feb 4;7(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00350-w.
8
Digital Health Interventions to Enhance Prevention in Primary Care: Scoping Review.数字健康干预措施加强初级保健中的预防工作:范围审查
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Jan 21;10(1):e33518. doi: 10.2196/33518.
9
Travel in the Physical and Mental Space: A Behavioral Assessment of the Phylogenetic Continuity Hypothesis Between Egocentric Navigation and Episodic Memory.在身心空间中旅行:自我中心导航和情景记忆之间的种系连续性假说的行为评估。
Evol Psychol. 2021 Jul-Sep;19(3):14747049211040823. doi: 10.1177/14747049211040823.
10
Current Update on the Clinical Utility of MMSE and MoCA for Stroke Patients in Asia: A Systematic Review.当前亚洲脑卒中患者 MMSE 和 MoCA 临床应用的最新进展:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 25;18(17):8962. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18178962.