• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单纯性白内障手术后前房穿刺液的微生物学特征

Microbiological profile of anterior chamber aspirates following uncomplicated cataract surgery.

作者信息

Prajna N V, Sathish S, Rajalakshmi P C, George C

机构信息

Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai, India.

出版信息

Indian J Ophthalmol. 1998 Dec;46(4):229-32.

PMID:10218306
Abstract

Anterior chamber aspirate cultures were done for 66 patients who underwent either an uncomplicated intracapsular cataract extraction, extracapsular cataract extraction with posterior-chamber intraocular lens implantation, or phacoemulsification with posterior-chamber intraocular lens implantation. The aspirate was obtained at the time of wound closure. The aspirates were immediately transferred to the microbiology laboratory where one drop of the aspirate was placed on a glass slide for gram stain, and the remainder was unequally divided and inoculated into blood agar, chocolate agar and thioglycolate broth. The cultures were incubated at 37 degrees C with 5% CO2 and held for 5 days. Of 66 patients 4 (6%), had smear-positive anterior chamber aspirates. None of the aspirates showed any growth on any of the 3 culture media used. None of the eyes in the study developed endophthalmitis. This study concludes that there is no contamination of the anterior chamber by viable bacteria after cataract surgery, irrespective of the mode of intervention.

摘要

对66例接受单纯囊内白内障摘除术、后房型人工晶状体植入的囊外白内障摘除术或后房型人工晶状体植入的超声乳化白内障吸除术的患者进行了前房穿刺液培养。穿刺液在伤口闭合时获取。穿刺液立即被送往微生物实验室,其中一滴被置于载玻片上进行革兰氏染色,其余部分不等分后接种到血琼脂、巧克力琼脂和硫乙醇酸盐肉汤中。培养物在37℃、5%二氧化碳条件下孵育5天。66例患者中有4例(6%)前房穿刺液涂片阳性。在所使用的3种培养基上,所有穿刺液均未显示任何生长。该研究中的眼睛均未发生眼内炎。本研究得出结论,白内障手术后前房不会被活菌污染,无论采用何种干预方式。

相似文献

1
Microbiological profile of anterior chamber aspirates following uncomplicated cataract surgery.单纯性白内障手术后前房穿刺液的微生物学特征
Indian J Ophthalmol. 1998 Dec;46(4):229-32.
2
A prospective evaluation of anterior chamber contamination following cataract surgery.白内障手术后前房污染的前瞻性评估。
J Indian Med Assoc. 2009 Jan;107(1):30, 32-3.
3
Bacterial contamination of anterior chamber during IOL surgery.人工晶状体植入手术期间前房的细菌污染。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 1999 Sep;47(3):185-9.
4
Microbial contamination of the anterior chamber during cataract phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation in dogs.犬白内障超声乳化吸除及人工晶状体植入术中前房的微生物污染
Vet Ophthalmol. 2004 Sep-Oct;7(5):327-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2004.04011.x.
5
Anterior chamber contamination during phacoemulsification and manual small-incision cataract surgery.白内障超声乳化吸除术和手法小切口白内障手术中的前房污染
Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Jun;141(6):1160-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.01.046.
6
Anterior chamber contamination following uncomplicated cataract surgery: comparative results using intravenous imipenem.单纯性白内障手术后前房污染:使用静脉注射亚胺培南的对比结果。
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1996 Dec;27(12):1005-11.
7
Bacterial contamination in the anterior chamber after povidone-iodine application and the effect of the lens implantation device.聚维酮碘应用后前房内的细菌污染及晶状体植入装置的影响。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Oct;32(10):1691-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.05.019.
8
Anterior chamber aspirate cultures after uncomplicated cataract surgery.单纯性白内障手术后前房穿刺液培养
Am J Ophthalmol. 1991 Sep 15;112(3):278-82. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)76728-5.
9
Bacterial contamination of intraocular and extraocular fluids during extracapsular cataract extraction.
Eye (Lond). 1989;3 ( Pt 3):308-12. doi: 10.1038/eye.1989.44.
10
[Bacteriological study of the intraocular fluid at the end of cataract surgery].
J Fr Ophtalmol. 1993;16(10):501-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Can antiseptic scrubs between cataract surgeries reduce bacterial load on surgical gloves to safe levels?白内障手术之间使用抗菌洗手液能否将手术手套上的细菌负荷降低到安全水平?
Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Mar;88(3):438-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2003.025437.