Suppr超能文献

授权偏差对病历研究的潜在影响。

Potential effect of authorization bias on medical record research.

作者信息

Jacobsen S J, Xia Z, Campion M E, Darby C H, Plevak M F, Seltman K D, Melton L J

机构信息

Section of Clinical Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

出版信息

Mayo Clin Proc. 1999 Apr;74(4):330-8. doi: 10.4065/74.4.330.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the influence of recent changes in Minnesota statutes that generally require prior authorization for use of medical records for research from patients who received medical care after Jan. 1, 1997.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board-approved study, we obtained a stratified random sample of patients encountered at Mayo Clinic Rochester during the period 1994 through 1996 and estimated the proportion willing to provide the general authorization. On the basis of data from administrative files, we then compared demographic, diagnostic, and utilization characteristics for patients who provided authorization and those who did not.

RESULTS

Overall, 3.2% (95% confidence interval, 2.4 to 4.0%) of the study subjects declined authorization. If patients not responding to requests for authorization were also considered to have refused, the overall refusal rate would be 20.7% (95% confidence interval, 18.5 to 22.9%). Women were somewhat more likely to refuse authorization than were men (4.0% versus 2.4%; P = 0.067), and patients younger than 60 years were more likely to refuse than were older patients (5.4% versus 1.2%; P<0.001). Patients residing more than 120 miles from Rochester were much less likely to decline authorization than were local residents (2.1% versus 5.8%; P = 0.001). Patients with prior diagnoses that might be considered more sensitive such as mental disorders, infectious diseases, and reproductive problems also were more likely to refuse authorization.

CONCLUSION

These data demonstrate that laws requiring written authorization for research use of the medical record could result in substantial biases in etiologic and outcome studies, the direction and magnitude of which may vary from topic to topic. Clinicians should be prepared to enter the discussion to help inform patients and legislators of the potential hazards of laws that restrict access to medical records for research purposes.

摘要

目的

分析明尼苏达州法规近期的变化所产生的影响,这些法规一般要求对于1997年1月1日之后接受医疗护理的患者,使用其医疗记录进行研究需事先获得授权。

材料与方法

在这项经梅奥诊所机构审查委员会批准的研究中,我们获取了1994年至1996年期间在罗切斯特梅奥诊所就诊患者的分层随机样本,并估计了愿意提供一般授权的患者比例。然后,根据行政档案中的数据,我们比较了提供授权和未提供授权患者的人口统计学、诊断和使用特征。

结果

总体而言,3.2%(95%置信区间为2.4%至4.0%)的研究对象拒绝授权。如果将未回复授权请求的患者也视为拒绝,那么总体拒绝率将为20.7%(95%置信区间为18.5%至22.9%)。女性拒绝授权的可能性略高于男性(4.0%对2.4%;P =

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验