Lingiardi V, Lonati C, Delucchi F, Fossati A, Vanzulli L, Maffei C
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Rome La Sapienza, Italy.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1999 Apr;187(4):224-8. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199904000-00005.
The evaluation of defense mechanisms represents one of the most promising fields in the psychodynamic-oriented empirical research on personality disorders (PDs). This study examines the association between DSM-IV PDs and defense mechanisms. We evaluated a sample of 50 adult outpatients seeking personality assessment and psychotherapeutic treatment. PDs have been assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorder, version 2.0. Defense mechanisms have been evaluated by a group of trained clinical psychologists and psychiatrists (interrater reliability from .61 to .95) using Perry's Defense Mechanism Rating Scale. Our results support the hypothesis that some defense mechanisms underlie PDs and that defenses call for further attention as we assess PDs.
防御机制的评估是人格障碍(PDs)心理动力学实证研究中最具前景的领域之一。本研究考察了《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)中人格障碍与防御机制之间的关联。我们评估了50名寻求人格评估和心理治疗的成年门诊患者样本。使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版人格障碍结构化临床访谈第二版(Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorder, version 2.0)对人格障碍进行评估。由一组训练有素的临床心理学家和精神科医生使用佩里防御机制评定量表(Perry's Defense Mechanism Rating Scale)对防御机制进行评估(评分者间信度为0.61至0.95)。我们的研究结果支持以下假设:某些防御机制是人格障碍的基础,并且在我们评估人格障碍时,防御机制需要进一步关注。