• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语音加工中的性别差异:快速匹配与单词阅读

Sex differences in phonological processes: speeded matching and word reading.

作者信息

Majeres R L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Western Illinois University, Macomb 61455, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1999 Mar;27(2):246-53. doi: 10.3758/bf03211409.

DOI:10.3758/bf03211409
PMID:10226435
Abstract

Sex differences in phonological processing were investigated in four experiments. Two experiments required college students to decide whether two five-letter strings matched. Same-case (AA) pairs of letter strings could be matched using physical features, whereas mixed-case (Aa) pairs of letter strings required the mediation of a speech-based code (letter name) for the comparison. Women were significantly faster than men when the comparisons required the speech-based codes. In another experiment, college students read lists of words and lists of pseudohomophones to determine whether there was a sex difference in the computation of phonology for unfamiliar words (assembled phonology). In a final experiment, students read lists of words with phonologically inconsistent spelling patterns to determine whether there was a sex difference in accessing pronunciations of familiar words (addressed phonology). Women were more proficient than men under both of these conditions. Results were interpreted in terms of a female advantage in both prelexical and lexical processing, an advantage that may stem from a sex difference in the quality of the phonological representations.

摘要

通过四项实验对语音处理中的性别差异进行了研究。两项实验要求大学生判断两个由五个字母组成的字符串是否匹配。同大小写(AA)的字母字符串对可以利用物理特征进行匹配,而异大小写(Aa)的字母字符串对则需要基于语音的编码(字母名称)来进行比较。当比较需要基于语音的编码时,女性的速度明显比男性快。在另一项实验中,大学生阅读单词列表和假同音字列表,以确定在处理不熟悉单词的语音计算(组合语音)方面是否存在性别差异。在最后一项实验中,学生阅读拼写模式在语音上不一致的单词列表,以确定在获取熟悉单词的发音(寻址语音)方面是否存在性别差异。在这两种情况下,女性都比男性更熟练。研究结果被解释为女性在词前和词汇处理方面都具有优势,这种优势可能源于语音表征质量上的性别差异。

相似文献

1
Sex differences in phonological processes: speeded matching and word reading.语音加工中的性别差异:快速匹配与单词阅读
Mem Cognit. 1999 Mar;27(2):246-53. doi: 10.3758/bf03211409.
2
From orthography to phonetics: ERP measures of grapheme-to-phoneme conversion mechanisms in reading.从正字法到语音学:阅读中字形到音素转换机制的事件相关电位测量
J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Mar;16(2):301-17. doi: 10.1162/089892904322984580.
3
Sex differences in phonetic processing: speed of identification of alphabetical sequences.语音处理中的性别差异:字母序列识别速度
Percept Mot Skills. 1997 Dec;85(3 Pt 2):1243-51. doi: 10.2466/pms.1997.85.3f.1243.
4
Is holistic processing of written words modulated by phonology?书面文字的整体加工是否受语音学的调节?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Oct;201:102944. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102944. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
5
New evidence for phonological processing during visual word recognition: the case of Arabic.视觉单词识别过程中语音加工的新证据:以阿拉伯语为例。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996 Mar;22(2):309-23. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.22.2.309.
6
What the reader's eye tells the mind's ear: silent reading activates inner speech.读者的眼睛向内心的耳朵传达了什么:默读激活内心言语。
Percept Psychophys. 1997 Oct;59(7):1059-68. doi: 10.3758/bf03205520.
7
Neurocognitive mechanisms of learning to read: print tuning in beginning readers related to word-reading fluency and semantics but not phonology.学习阅读的神经认知机制:初学阅读者的印刷体调适与单词阅读流畅性和语义相关,但与语音无关。
Dev Sci. 2015 Jan;18(1):106-18. doi: 10.1111/desc.12189. Epub 2014 May 26.
8
The role of orthography in the semantic activation of neighbors.正字法在邻居语义激活中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Sep;38(5):1259-73. doi: 10.1037/a0028150. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
9
The strong, the weak, and the first: The impact of phonological stress on processing of orthographic errors in silent reading.强者、弱者与首因效应:语音重音对默读中拼写错误处理的影响
Brain Res. 2016 Apr 1;1636:208-218. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
10
Phonological awareness and early reading development in childhood apraxia of speech (CAS).语音意识与儿童言语运动障碍的早期阅读发展。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2009 Mar-Apr;44(2):175-92. doi: 10.1080/13682820801997353.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterising and differentiating cognitive and motor speed in older adults: structural equation modelling on a UK longitudinal birth cohort.描述和区分老年人的认知和运动速度:基于英国纵向出生队列的结构方程模型。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 19;14(8):e083968. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-083968.
2
Sex differences in the Simon task help to interpret sex differences in selective attention.西蒙任务中的性别差异有助于解释选择性注意中的性别差异。
Psychol Res. 2017 May;81(3):571-581. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0763-4. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
3
The NIH Toolbox Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test: Normative Data.

本文引用的文献

1
Sex differences in clerical speed: Perceptual encoding vs. verbal encoding.性别在文书速度上的差异:知觉编码与言语编码。
Mem Cognit. 1977 Jul;5(4):468-76. doi: 10.3758/BF03197388.
2
Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: true issues and false trails.迈向视觉单词识别的强大语音理论:真实问题与错误线索。
Psychol Bull. 1998 Jan;123(1):71-99. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.123.1.71.
3
Predicting reading performance from neuroimaging profiles: the cerebral basis of phonological effects in printed word identification.
美国国立卫生研究院工具箱模式比较处理速度测试:规范数据。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2015 Aug;30(5):359-68. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acv031. Epub 2015 May 29.
4
NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery (NIHTB-CB): the NIHTB Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test.美国国立卫生研究院工具箱认知能力测试(NIHTB-CB):NIHTB模式比较处理速度测试。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2014 Jul;20(6):630-41. doi: 10.1017/S1355617714000319. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
从神经影像特征预测阅读能力:印刷文字识别中语音效应的脑基础
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997 Apr;23(2):299-318. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.23.2.299.
4
Similar attentional, frequency, and associative effects for pseudohomophones and words.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993 Feb;19(1):166-78. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.19.1.166.
5
Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language.大脑语言功能组织中的性别差异。
Nature. 1995 Feb 16;373(6515):607-9. doi: 10.1038/373607a0.
6
Individual differences among children in spelling and reading styles.
J Exp Child Psychol. 1984 Jun;37(3):463-77. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(84)90071-7.
7
Multifactorial assessment of reading disability: identifying the best predictors.阅读障碍的多因素评估:确定最佳预测因素。
Percept Mot Skills. 1985 Jun;60(3):747-53. doi: 10.2466/pms.1985.60.3.747.
8
Working memory.工作记忆
Science. 1992 Jan 31;255(5044):556-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1736359.