• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

爱荷华人格障碍筛查:简短筛查访谈的开发与初步验证

The Iowa Personality Disorder Screen: development and preliminary validation of a brief screening interview.

作者信息

Langbehn D R, Pfohl B M, Reynolds S, Clark L A, Battaglia M, Bellodi L, Cadoret R, Grove W, Pilkonis P, Links P

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, VA Medical Center, Iowa City, IA 52246, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Disord. 1999 Spring;13(1):75-89. doi: 10.1521/pedi.1999.13.1.75.

DOI:10.1521/pedi.1999.13.1.75
PMID:10228929
Abstract

The length and expense of comprehensive personality disorder interviews makes them unwieldy for routine use. A brief but sensitive screen could eliminate administration of longer instruments in many instances. We describe the development of the Iowa Personality Disorder Screen (IPDS)--a mini-structured interview which can be completed in less than 5 minutes. Retrospective analyses using 1,203 SIDP-R interviews suggested that the IPDS items should provide good sensitivity and specificity. We present results from a prospective validation study, using a mixed group of 52 nonpsychotic inpatients and outpatients who were diagnosed using the SIDP-IV. Blind administration of the IPDS yielded excellent sensitivity (92%) and good specificity (79%), using a subset of five screening items. Addition of two more items leads to an estimated sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 86%. The IPDS shows promise as a quick personality disorder screen for use in research settings or standard clinical interviews.

摘要

全面性人格障碍访谈的时长和成本使其在常规使用中不太方便。在许多情况下,一个简短但灵敏的筛查工具可以避免使用更长的测评工具。我们描述了爱荷华人格障碍筛查量表(IPDS)的开发过程——这是一种小型结构化访谈,可在不到5分钟内完成。使用1203次结构性访谈诊断人格障碍量表(SIDP-R)进行的回顾性分析表明,IPDS的项目应具有良好的敏感性和特异性。我们展示了一项前瞻性验证研究的结果,该研究使用了一组52名非精神病性住院患者和门诊患者的混合样本,这些患者使用结构性访谈诊断人格障碍量表第四版(SIDP-IV)进行诊断。使用五个筛查项目的子集对IPDS进行盲法施测,其敏感性极佳(92%),特异性良好(79%)。再增加两个项目后,估计敏感性为79%,特异性为86%。IPDS有望成为一种用于研究环境或标准临床访谈的快速人格障碍筛查工具。

相似文献

1
The Iowa Personality Disorder Screen: development and preliminary validation of a brief screening interview.爱荷华人格障碍筛查:简短筛查访谈的开发与初步验证
J Pers Disord. 1999 Spring;13(1):75-89. doi: 10.1521/pedi.1999.13.1.75.
2
Diagnostic efficiency of the Iowa personality disorder screen items in a nonclinical sample.爱荷华人格障碍筛查项目在非临床样本中的诊断效率
J Pers Disord. 2001 Aug;15(4):351-7. doi: 10.1521/pedi.15.4.351.19184.
3
Results of the search for personality disorder screening tools: clinical implications.人格障碍筛查工具的研究结果:临床意义。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;73(2):165-73. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11m07067.
4
[Preliminary comparative study of the personality disorder evaluation DIP instrument with the semi-structured SCID-II interview].[人格障碍评估工具DIP与半结构化访谈SCID-II的初步比较研究]
Encephale. 2009 Dec;35(6):544-53. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.09.007.
5
A cross-sectional testing of The Iowa Personality Disorder Screen in a psychiatric outpatient setting.横断面测试《爱荷华人格障碍筛查表》在精神科门诊环境中的应用。
BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Jun 28;11:105. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-105.
6
Maximum likelihood estimates of the ability of the MMPI and MCMI personality disorder scales and the SIDP to identify personality disorders.明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)、米隆临床多轴问卷(MCMI)人格障碍量表以及结构化访谈诊断人格障碍量表(SIDP)识别出人格障碍的能力的最大似然估计值。
J Pers Assess. 1992 Aug;59(1):1-13. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5901_1.
7
The Iowa Personality Disorder Screen: A validation study in a psychiatric population that receives long-term group psychotherapy for personality related problems.爱荷华人格障碍筛查表:在接受长期人格相关问题团体心理治疗的精神科人群中的验证研究。
Personal Ment Health. 2018 Aug;12(3):229-240. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1418. Epub 2018 May 3.
8
Diagnostic efficiency among psychiatric outpatients of a self-report version of a subset of screen items of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Personality Disorders (SCID-II).DSM-IV-TR 人格障碍定式临床访谈量表(SCID-II)筛查项目子集的自报告版本对精神科门诊患者的诊断效率。
Psychol Assess. 2010 Dec;22(4):945-52. doi: 10.1037/a0021047.
9
Validity of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-Revised: a replication in an outpatient sample.《人格诊断问卷修订版》的效度:门诊样本中的重复研究
Compr Psychiatry. 1992 Mar-Apr;33(2):73-7. doi: 10.1016/0010-440x(92)90001-7.
10
The psychometric properties of the iowa personality disorder screen in methadone-maintained patients: an initial investigation.美沙酮维持治疗患者中爱荷华人格障碍筛查的心理测量特性:初步研究。
J Pers Disord. 2015 Feb;29(1):131-44. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2013_27_081. Epub 2013 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The association between patient engagement and treatment outcome in guided internet-delivered CBT for anxiety and depression.在通过互联网提供指导的认知行为疗法治疗焦虑和抑郁中,患者参与度与治疗结果之间的关联。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 9;16:1494729. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1494729. eCollection 2025.
2
Concurrent and prospective prediction of community-dwelling adults' psychosocial functioning with the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms-II (IDAS-II).使用抑郁与焦虑症状量表第二版(IDAS-II)对社区居住成年人的心理社会功能进行同时性和前瞻性预测。
Psychol Assess. 2024 Dec;36(12):749-759. doi: 10.1037/pas0001347. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
3
The Utility of Neuromuscular Assessment to Identify ADHD Among Patients with a Complex Symptom Picture.
神经肌肉评估在识别复杂症状患者中的 ADHD 中的效用。
J Atten Disord. 2024 Oct;28(12):1577-1588. doi: 10.1177/10870547241273102. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
4
Longitudinal prediction of psychosocial functioning outcomes: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Section-II personality disorders versus alternative model personality dysfunction and traits.纵向预测心理社会功能结局:《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版,第二部分人格障碍与替代模型人格功能障碍和特质。
Personal Disord. 2024 Sep;15(5):341-351. doi: 10.1037/per0000673. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
5
Estimating classification consistency of machine learning models for screening measures.估算筛查措施的机器学习模型分类一致性。
Psychol Assess. 2024 Jun-Jul;36(6-7):395-406. doi: 10.1037/pas0001313.
6
Personality disorder coverage, prevalence, and convergence: do the 's two models of personality disorder identify the same patients?人格障碍的涵盖范围、流行率和趋同:“DSM-5 和 ICD-11 人格障碍模型是否能识别出相同的患者?”
Psychol Med. 2024 Jul;54(9):2210-2221. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724000357. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
7
Diagnosing attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) using artificial intelligence: a clinical study in the UK.利用人工智能诊断注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD):英国的一项临床研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 9;14:1164433. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1164433. eCollection 2023.
8
Evaluating a Comprehensive Model of Euthymia.评估轻躁稳态的综合模型。
Psychother Psychosom. 2023;92(2):133-138. doi: 10.1159/000529784. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
9
Comorbidity and heterogeneity: Two challenges for personality pathology research.共病与异质性:人格病理学研究的两大挑战。
Personal Disord. 2023 Jan;14(1):39-49. doi: 10.1037/per0000586.
10
COVID-Dynamic: A large-scale longitudinal study of socioemotional and behavioral change across the pandemic.COVID-Dynamic:一项针对大流行期间社会情感和行为变化的大规模纵向研究。
Sci Data. 2023 Feb 3;10(1):71. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01901-6.