Benfeldt E, Serup J, Menné T
Department of Dermatology, University of Copenhagen, Gentofte Hospital, Niels Andersensvej 65, DK 2900 Hellerup, Denmark.
Br J Dermatol. 1999 Apr;140(4):739-48. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.02859.x.
We have used microdialysis in the dermis for assessing penetration kinetics of salicylic acid (SA) in healthy volunteers (n = 18), following application on the volar aspect of the left forearm. Penetration was monitored at four locations: in normal (unmodified) skin and in skin with perturbed barrier function from (i) repeated tape stripping (ii) irritant dermatitis from 1 or 2% sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) for 24 h and (iii) delipidization by acetone. The order of the treatments was randomized according to a latin square design. Epidermal barrier function and skin irritation were assessed in each location using evaporimetry and colorimetry. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) values confirmed that both mild (acetone), moderate (1% SLS) and severe barrier damage (tape stripping and 2% SLS) had occurred. Microdialysis sampling with two parallel probes in the dermis was performed in each of the four treatment areas for every subject. SA (5% in ethanol) was applied in a chamber glued to the skin overlying the microdialysis probes and sampling was continued for 4 h. SA was detectable in all samples and measurable in all samples from penetration through perturbed skin. Comparing the SA penetration in barrier-perturbed skin with the penetration in unmodified skin in the same subject, the mean SA penetration increase was 2.2-fold in acetone-treated skin (P = 0.012), 46-fold in mild dermatitis and 146- and 157-fold in severe dermatitis and tape stripped skin, respectively (P < 0.001). The penetration of SA significantly correlated with the measurements of barrier perturbation by TEWL (P = 0.01) and erythema (P = 0.02) for each individual. Microdialysis sampling of SA penetration was more sensitive than non-invasive measuring techniques in detecting significant barrier perturbation in acetone-treated skin. A positive dose-response relationship for the percutaneous penetration of SA in response to increasing SLS pretreatment concentrations and thus the degree of irritant dermatitis was found. When analysing data by location on the forearm, a tendency towards an intraregional variation in the reactivity to barrier damage was found, with the most proximal location displaying higher reactivity scores than the most distal location in response to the same barrier perturbation procedures. The penetration of SA was not significantly different between locations. In conclusion, using microdialysis in the dermis to obtain real-time dermal pharmacokinetics in the target organ, this study demonstrates highly increased and differentiated cutaneous penetration of SA in barrier-perturbed skin. The measured drug penetration was demonstrated to correlate with non-invasive quantification of barrier damage.
我们对18名健康志愿者的真皮进行了微透析,以评估水杨酸(SA)在左前臂掌侧涂抹后的渗透动力学。在四个部位监测渗透情况:正常(未改变)皮肤以及屏障功能受到干扰的皮肤,后者包括:(i)反复胶带剥离;(ii)用1%或2%的月桂醇硫酸酯钠(SLS)诱发刺激性皮炎24小时;(iii)用丙酮脱脂。治疗顺序根据拉丁方设计随机安排。使用蒸发测定法和比色法在每个部位评估表皮屏障功能和皮肤刺激性。经表皮水分流失(TEWL)值证实,已经出现了轻度(丙酮)、中度(1% SLS)和重度屏障损伤(胶带剥离和2% SLS)。在每个受试者的四个治疗区域中的每个区域,均在真皮中使用两个平行探针进行微透析采样。将SA(5%乙醇溶液)涂抹在粘贴于覆盖微透析探针的皮肤上的腔室中,并持续采样4小时。在所有样品中均可检测到SA,并且在所有通过受损皮肤渗透的样品中均可测量到SA。将同一受试者屏障受损皮肤中的SA渗透情况与未改变皮肤中的渗透情况进行比较,SA渗透平均增加倍数在丙酮处理的皮肤中为2.2倍(P = 0.012),在轻度皮炎中为46倍,在重度皮炎和胶带剥离皮肤中分别为146倍和157倍(P < 0.001)。对于每个个体,SA的渗透与通过TEWL(P = 0.01)和红斑(P = 0.02)进行的屏障干扰测量值显著相关。在检测丙酮处理皮肤中的显著屏障干扰方面,SA渗透的微透析采样比非侵入性测量技术更敏感。发现SA的经皮渗透与SLS预处理浓度增加以及由此导致的刺激性皮炎程度呈正剂量反应关系。在前臂按部位分析数据时,发现对屏障损伤的反应存在区域内变化趋势,在相同的屏障干扰程序下,最靠近近端的部位比最远端的部位显示出更高的反应性评分。SA的渗透在各部位之间无显著差异。总之,本研究通过在真皮中使用微透析来获取靶器官中的实时真皮药代动力学,证明了SA在屏障受损皮肤中的皮肤渗透显著增加且具有差异。所测得的药物渗透与屏障损伤的非侵入性定量相关。