VanCott T C, Mascola J R, Loomis-Price L D, Sinangil F, Zitomersky N, McNeil J, Robb M L, Birx D L, Barnett S
Henry M. Jackson Foundation, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA.
J Virol. 1999 Jun;73(6):4640-50. doi: 10.1128/JVI.73.6.4640-4650.1999.
Global human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) diversity may require engineering vaccines to express antigens representing strains prevalent in the target population of vaccine testing. The majority (90%) of incident infections in Thailand are genetic subtype E, with a small percentage of subtype B infections in the intravenous drug user populations. We have evaluated and compared the binding and HIV-1 neutralizing properties of serum antibodies induced in baboons by CHO cell-expressed monomeric gp120 derived from a CCR5-using (R5) subtype E primary HIV-1CM235 or a CXCR4-using (X4) subtype B T-cell line-adapted (TCLA) HIV-1SF2 isolate. In contrast to the subtype-specific HIV-1 neutralizing antibodies induced with recombinant HIV-1SF2 gp120 (rgp120SF2), rgp120CM235 immunization induced antibodies capable of neutralizing both subtype E and subtype B TCLA HIV-1 isolates. However, neither immunogen induced antibodies capable of neutralizing primary HIV-1 isolates. Antibody induced by rgp120CM235 preferentially bound natively folded gp120 and retained strong cross-reactivity against multiple gp120 strains within subtype E as well as subtype B. In contrast, antibody responses to rgp120SF2 were directed predominantly to linear epitopes poorly exposed on native gp120 and had more limited cross-recognition of divergent gp120. Fine epitope mapping revealed differences in antibody specificities. While both rgp120CM235 and rgp120SF2 induced antibodies to regions within C1, V1/V2, V3, and C5, unique responses were induced by rgp120CM235 to multiple epitopes within C2 and by rgp120SF2 to multiple epitopes within C3, V4, and C4. These data demonstrate that strain and/or phenotypic differences of HIV-1 subunit gp120 immunogens can substantially alter antibody binding specificities and subsequent HIV-1 neutralizing capacity.
全球人类免疫缺陷病毒1型(HIV-1)的多样性可能需要设计疫苗来表达代表疫苗测试目标人群中流行毒株的抗原。泰国大多数(90%)新发感染为基因E亚型,静脉吸毒人群中有一小部分为B亚型感染。我们评估并比较了由中国仓鼠卵巢(CHO)细胞表达的源自使用CCR5的(R5)E亚型原发性HIV-1 CM235或使用CXCR4的(X4)B亚型T细胞系适应株(TCLA)HIV-1 SF2分离株的单体gp120在狒狒体内诱导产生的血清抗体的结合特性和HIV-1中和特性。与重组HIV-1 SF2 gp120(rgp120 SF2)诱导产生的亚型特异性HIV-1中和抗体不同,rgp120 CM235免疫诱导产生的抗体能够中和E亚型和B亚型TCLA HIV-1分离株。然而,两种免疫原均未诱导产生能够中和原发性HIV-1分离株的抗体。rgp120 CM235诱导产生的抗体优先结合天然折叠的gp120,并对E亚型以及B亚型内的多种gp120毒株保持强烈的交叉反应性。相比之下,针对rgp120 SF2的抗体反应主要针对天然gp120上暴露不佳的线性表位,并对不同的gp120具有更有限的交叉识别。精细表位图谱分析揭示了抗体特异性的差异。虽然rgp120 CM235和rgp120 SF2均诱导产生针对C1、V1/V2、V3和C5区域的抗体,但rgp120 CM235诱导产生针对C2内多个表位的独特反应,而rgp120 SF2诱导产生针对C3、V4和C4内多个表位的独特反应。这些数据表明,HIV-1亚基gp120免疫原的毒株和/或表型差异可显著改变抗体结合特异性以及随后的HIV-1中和能力。