Herculano-Houzel S, Munk M H, Neuenschwander S, Singer W
Max-Planck-Institut für Hirnforschung, 60528 Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
J Neurosci. 1999 May 15;19(10):3992-4010. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-10-03992.1999.
Neuronal response synchronization with millisecond precision has been proposed to serve feature binding in vision and should therefore, like visual experience, depend on central states. Here we test this hypothesis by examining the occurrence and strength of response synchronization in areas 17 and 18 of anesthetized cats as a function of central states. These were assessed from the frequency content of the electroencephalogram, low power in the delta and high power in the gamma frequency ranges (here 20-70 Hz) being considered as a signature of activated states. We evaluated both spontaneous state changes and transitions induced by electrical stimulation of the mesencephalic reticular formation. During states of low central activation, visual responses were robust but lacked signs of precise synchronization. At intermediate levels of activation, responses became synchronized and exhibited an oscillatory patterning in the range of 70-105 Hz. At higher levels of activation, a different pattern of response synchronization and oscillatory modulation appeared, oscillation frequency now being in the range of 20-65 Hz. The strength of response synchronization and oscillatory modulation in the 20-65 Hz range increased with further activation and was associated with a decrease in oscillation frequency. We propose that the oscillatory patterning in the 70-105 Hz range is attributable to oscillatory retinothalamic input and that a minimal level of activation is necessary for cortical neurons to follow this oscillatory pattern. In contrast, the synchronization of responses at oscillation frequencies in the 20-65 Hz range appears to result from intracortical synchronizing mechanisms, which become progressively more effective as central activation increases. Surprisingly, enhanced synchronization and oscillatory modulation in the gamma frequency range were not associated with consistent increases in response amplitude, excluding a simple relation between central activation and neuronal discharge rate. The fact that intracortical synchronizing mechanisms are particularly effective during states of central activation supports the hypothesis that precise synchronization of responses plays a role in sensory processing.
神经元以毫秒级精度的反应同步被认为有助于视觉中的特征捆绑,因此,与视觉体验一样,应该依赖于中枢状态。在这里,我们通过检查麻醉猫的17区和18区反应同步的发生情况和强度作为中枢状态的函数来检验这一假设。这些是根据脑电图的频率成分来评估的,δ频段的低功率和γ频段(这里是20 - 70赫兹)的高功率被视为激活状态的标志。我们评估了自发的状态变化以及中脑网状结构电刺激诱导的转变。在中枢激活水平较低的状态下,视觉反应强烈但缺乏精确同步的迹象。在中等激活水平时,反应变得同步并呈现出70 - 105赫兹范围内的振荡模式。在较高激活水平时,出现了不同的反应同步和振荡调制模式,振荡频率现在在20 - 65赫兹范围内。20 - 65赫兹范围内反应同步和振荡调制的强度随着进一步激活而增加,并且与振荡频率的降低相关。我们提出70 - 105赫兹范围内的振荡模式归因于振荡性视网膜丘脑输入,并且皮质神经元跟随这种振荡模式需要最低水平的激活。相比之下,20 - 65赫兹范围内振荡频率的反应同步似乎是由皮质内同步机制导致的,随着中枢激活增加,这种机制变得越来越有效。令人惊讶的是,γ频段增强的同步和振荡调制与反应幅度的持续增加无关,排除了中枢激活与神经元放电率之间的简单关系。皮质内同步机制在中枢激活状态下特别有效的这一事实支持了反应的精确同步在感觉处理中起作用的假设。