Shrock D, Palmer R F, Taylor B
Department of Family Practice, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, USA.
Altern Ther Health Med. 1999 May;5(3):49-55.
Psychosocial factors have been linked to the development and progression of cancer and shown to be relevant in cancer care. However, the evidence that psychosocial interventions affect cancer survival is less conclusive. Few methodologically sound studies have addressed this issue.
To investigate the effects of a 6-week psychosocial intervention on survival among patients with stage I breast and prostate cancer.
Matched case-control.
3 rural hospitals or cancer centers in central Pennsylvania.
21 breast and 29 prostate stage I cancer patients (treatment group) matched with 74 breast and 65 prostate stage I cancer patients from the same hospitals who did not receive the intervention (control group).
Six 2-hour health psychology classes conducted by a licensed staff psychologist.
Survival time was compared between the 2 groups and with national norms.
The intervention group lived significantly longer than did matched controls. At 4- to 7-year follow-up (median = 4.2 years), none of the breast cancer patients in the intervention group died, whereas 12% of those in the control group died. Twice as many matched-control prostate cancer patients died compared with those in the intervention group (28% vs 14%). Control group survival was similar to national norms.
These results are consistent with prior clinical trials and suggest that short-term psychosocial interventions that encourage the expression of emotions, provide social support, and teach coping skills can influence survival among cancer patients. However, self-selection bias cannot be ruled out as an alternative explanation for the results. These interventions merit further consideration and research.
社会心理因素已被证明与癌症的发生和发展相关,并且在癌症护理中具有重要意义。然而,社会心理干预对癌症患者生存影响的证据尚不确凿。很少有方法学严谨的研究探讨过这个问题。
研究为期6周的社会心理干预对I期乳腺癌和前列腺癌患者生存的影响。
配对病例对照研究。
宾夕法尼亚州中部的3家乡村医院或癌症中心。
21例I期乳腺癌患者和29例I期前列腺癌患者(治疗组),与来自同医院的74例I期乳腺癌患者和65例I期前列腺癌患者配对,后者未接受干预(对照组)。
由持牌临床心理学家开展6次每次2小时的健康心理学课程。
比较两组患者的生存时间,并与全国标准进行对比。
干预组的生存期显著长于配对对照组。在4至7年的随访期(中位数 = 4.2年),干预组中没有乳腺癌患者死亡,而对照组中有12%的患者死亡。配对对照组中前列腺癌患者的死亡人数是干预组的两倍(28% 对14%)。对照组的生存率与全国标准相似。
这些结果与之前的临床试验一致,表明鼓励情感表达、提供社会支持并教授应对技巧的短期社会心理干预可以影响癌症患者的生存。然而,不能排除自我选择偏倚作为结果的另一种解释。这些干预措施值得进一步考虑和研究。