Shosteck H, Fairweather W R
Public Opin Q. 1979 Summer;43(2):206-17. doi: 10.1086/268512.
This paper reports the outcome of a randomized experiment, sponsored by the Food and Drug Administration, which compares mail and personal administration of a 12-page questionnaire dealing with physician antibiotic prescription practices. To overcome the barrier created by the lack of clearly defined and accepted definitions of survey outcomes, the authors introduce six concepts for describing and comparing survey outcomes. Overall, mail surveys appear to require less time, to be less costly, and to generate higher response rates than equivalent personal contacts. The report describes methods for gaining maximum benefit from the mail technique.
本文报告了一项由美国食品药品监督管理局资助的随机试验结果,该试验比较了通过邮寄和亲自发放方式进行的一项关于医生抗生素处方行为的12页调查问卷的情况。为克服因缺乏明确界定和被认可的调查结果定义所造成的障碍,作者引入了六个用于描述和比较调查结果的概念。总体而言,与同等的亲自接触相比,邮寄调查似乎所需时间更少、成本更低且回复率更高。该报告描述了从邮寄技术中获取最大益处的方法。