• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高基于互联网的医生调查问卷回复率的激励与提醒策略:一项随机试验。

Incentive and Reminder Strategies to Improve Response Rate for Internet-Based Physician Surveys: A Randomized Experiment.

作者信息

Cook David A, Wittich Christopher M, Daniels Wendlyn L, West Colin P, Harris Ann M, Beebe Timothy J

机构信息

Mayo Clinic Online Learning, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2016 Sep 16;18(9):e244. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6318.

DOI:10.2196/jmir.6318
PMID:27637296
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5045523/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most research on how to enhance response rates in physician surveys has been done using paper surveys. Uncertainties remain regarding how to enhance response rates in Internet-based surveys.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of a low-cost nonmonetary incentive and paper mail reminders (formal letter and postcard) on response rates in Internet-based physician surveys.

METHODS

We executed a factorial-design randomized experiment while conducting a nationally representative Internet-based physician survey. We invited 3966 physicians (randomly selected from a commercial database of all licensed US physicians) via email to complete an Internet-based survey. We used 2 randomly assigned email messages: one message offered a book upon survey completion, whereas the other did not mention the book but was otherwise identical. All nonrespondents received several email reminders. Some physicians were further assigned at random to receive 1 reminder via paper mail (either a postcard or a letter) or no paper reminder. The primary outcome of this study was the survey response rate.

RESULTS

Of the 3966 physicians who were invited, 451 (11.4%) responded to at least one survey question and 336 (8.5%) completed the entire survey. Of those who were offered a book, 345/2973 (11.6%) responded compared with 106/993 (10.7%) who were not offered a book (odds ratio 1.10, 95% CI 0.87-1.38, P=.42). Regarding the paper mail reminder, 168/1572 (10.7%) letter recipients, 148/1561 (9.5%) postcard recipients, and 69/767 (9.0%) email-only recipients responded (P=.35). The response rate for those receiving letters or postcards was similar (odds ratio 1.14, 95% CI 0.91-1.44, P=.26).

CONCLUSIONS

Offering a modest nonmonetary incentive and sending a paper reminder did not improve survey response rate. Further research on how to enhance response rates in Internet-based physician surveys is needed.

摘要

背景

大多数关于如何提高医生调查问卷回复率的研究都是使用纸质调查问卷进行的。对于如何提高基于互联网的调查问卷的回复率仍存在不确定性。

目的

评估低成本非货币激励措施和纸质邮件提醒(正式信函和明信片)对基于互联网的医生调查问卷回复率的影响。

方法

在进行一项具有全国代表性的基于互联网的医生调查时,我们执行了一项析因设计随机试验。我们通过电子邮件邀请了3966名医生(从美国所有持牌医生的商业数据库中随机选择)完成一项基于互联网的调查。我们使用了2条随机分配的电子邮件:一条信息表示在调查完成后提供一本书,而另一条没有提及这本书,但其他方面相同。所有未回复者都收到了几条电子邮件提醒。一些医生还被随机分配接受1次纸质邮件提醒(要么是明信片要么是信函)或不接受纸质提醒。本研究的主要结果是调查问卷回复率。

结果

在受邀的3966名医生中,451名(11.4%)对至少一个调查问题做出了回复,336名(8.5%)完成了整个调查。在那些被提供一本书的人中,345/2973(11.6%)做出了回复,而未被提供书的人中106/993(10.7%)做出了回复(优势比1.10,95%置信区间0.87 - 1.38,P = 0.42)。关于纸质邮件提醒,168/1572(10.7%)信函接收者、148/1561(9.5%)明信片接收者和69/767(9.0%)仅接收电子邮件者做出了回复(P = 0.35)。接收信函或明信片者的回复率相似(优势比1.14,95%置信区间0.91 - 1.44,P = 0.26)。

结论

提供适度的非货币激励措施和发送纸质提醒并不能提高调查问卷回复率。需要对如何提高基于互联网的医生调查问卷回复率进行进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b782/5045523/308acba47f8e/jmir_v18i9e244_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b782/5045523/ba69b0faad43/jmir_v18i9e244_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b782/5045523/25ec9c0d7dc5/jmir_v18i9e244_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b782/5045523/308acba47f8e/jmir_v18i9e244_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b782/5045523/ba69b0faad43/jmir_v18i9e244_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b782/5045523/25ec9c0d7dc5/jmir_v18i9e244_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b782/5045523/308acba47f8e/jmir_v18i9e244_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Incentive and Reminder Strategies to Improve Response Rate for Internet-Based Physician Surveys: A Randomized Experiment.提高基于互联网的医生调查问卷回复率的激励与提醒策略:一项随机试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Sep 16;18(9):e244. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6318.
2
A randomized trial of mail and email recruitment strategies for a physician survey on clinical trial accrual.一项关于临床试验入组的医师调查的邮件和电子邮件招募策略的随机试验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 May 19;20(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01014-x.
3
Effects of a financial incentive on health researchers' response to an online survey: a randomized controlled trial.经济激励对健康研究人员在线调查回复率的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2010 May 10;12(2):e13. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1251.
4
Which Outreach Modes Improve Response Rates to Physician Surveys? Lessons from an Experiment at the American Board of Internal Medicine.哪些外展模式能提高医师调查的回复率?美国内科医师学会实验的经验教训。
Eval Health Prof. 2023 Mar;46(1):48-53. doi: 10.1177/01632787221143151. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
5
SMS text pre-notification and delivery of reminder e-mails to increase response rates to postal questionnaires in the SUSPEND trial: a factorial design, randomised controlled trial.在SUSPEND试验中,通过短信预通知和发送提醒电子邮件来提高邮寄问卷的回复率:析因设计随机对照试验
Trials. 2015 Jul 8;16:295. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0808-9.
6
A method for achieving high response rates in national surveys of U.S. primary care physicians.一种提高美国初级保健医师全国调查回应率的方法。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 23;13(8):e0202755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202755. eCollection 2018.
7
Randomized trial of use of a monetary incentive and a reminder card to increase the response rate to a mailed health survey.一项关于使用金钱激励和提醒卡来提高邮寄健康调查问卷回复率的随机试验。
Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Nov 1;138(9):714-22. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116909.
8
Do incentives, reminders or reduced burden improve healthcare professional response rates in postal questionnaires? two randomised controlled trials.激励措施、提醒或减轻负担是否能提高邮政问卷调查中医疗保健专业人员的回复率?两项随机对照试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 14;12:250. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-250.
9
The effectiveness of recruitment strategies on general practitioner's survey response rates - a systematic review.招聘策略对全科医生调查回复率的有效性——一项系统综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Jun 6;14:76. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-76.
10
Effects of various methodologic strategies: survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training.各种方法策略的效果:加拿大医生及实习医生的调查回复率
Can Fam Physician. 2008 Oct;54(10):1424-30.

引用本文的文献

1
Antiarrhythmic drug use in atrial fibrillation among different European countries - as determined by a physician survey.不同欧洲国家心房颤动患者抗心律失常药物的使用情况——基于一项医师调查的结果
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025 May 31;59:101709. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101709. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Behind closed doors: a qualitative study exploring the content of fertility discussions between oncologists and their adolescent and young adult cancer patients from the perspective of oncologists at an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center.闭门探讨:一项定性研究,从美国国立癌症研究所指定的综合癌症中心的肿瘤学家视角,探索肿瘤学家与其青少年及青年癌症患者之间生育力讨论的内容。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Mar 21;33(4):308. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09269-0.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Reforming the continuing medical education system.改革继续医学教育体系。
JAMA. 2015 May 12;313(18):1813-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.4138.
2
Getting maintenance of certification to work: a grounded theory study of physicians' perceptions.获得认证维持的工作:对医生认知的扎根理论研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jan;175(1):35-42. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5437.
3
Enhancing surveys of health care professionals: a meta-analysis of techniques to improve response.提高卫生保健专业人员调查的回应率:改善回应率的技术的荟萃分析。
Status of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in clinical application and scientific research: a national survey in China.心血管磁共振成像在临床应用与科研中的现状:一项中国全国性调查
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2025;27(1):101877. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101877. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
4
An app to keep: smartphone-based dispatch of community first responder to cardiac arrest.一款值得留存的应用程序:基于智能手机派遣社区急救员应对心脏骤停情况。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Mar 7;25(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04586-y.
5
Is greenspace in the eye of the beholder? Exploring perceived and objective greenspace exposure effects on mental health.绿地空间是否因人而异?探究感知到的和客观存在的绿地空间暴露对心理健康的影响。
J Environ Psychol. 2024 Dec;100. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102468. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
6
Exploring factors of physicians' preferences for continuing medical education.探索医生对继续医学教育偏好的因素。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 25;24(1):1359. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06374-2.
7
Preoperative Anxiety Management Practices in Pediatric Anesthesia: Comparative Analysis of an Online Survey Presented to Experts and Social Media Users.小儿麻醉术前焦虑管理实践:面向专家和社交媒体用户的在线调查比较分析
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2025 Jan 27;8:e64561. doi: 10.2196/64561.
8
Addressing the "Last Mile" Problem in Educational Research: Educational Researchers' Interest, Knowledge, and Use of Implementation Science Constructs.解决教育研究中的“最后一英里”问题:教育研究者对实施科学概念的兴趣、了解及应用
Educ Res Eval. 2023;28(7-8):205-233. doi: 10.1080/13803611.2023.2285440. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
9
What Helps or Hinders End-of-Life Care in Adult Intensive Care Units in Saudi Arabia? A Mixed-Methods Study Protocol.沙特阿拉伯成人重症监护病房中,哪些因素有助于或阻碍临终关怀?一项混合方法研究方案。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Dec 9;12(23):2489. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12232489.
10
MS brain health quality standards: a survey on the reality in clinical practice in Germany.多发性硬化症脑部健康质量标准:德国临床实践现状调查
Neurol Res Pract. 2024 Nov 18;6(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s42466-024-00333-4.
Eval Health Prof. 2013 Sep;36(3):382-407. doi: 10.1177/0163278713496425.
4
Surveying clinicians by web: current issues in design and administration.通过网络调查临床医生:设计和管理中的当前问题。
Eval Health Prof. 2013 Sep;36(3):352-81. doi: 10.1177/0163278713496630.
5
Facilitators and barriers to survey participation by physicians: a call to action for researchers.医生参与调查的促进因素和障碍:研究人员的行动呼吁。
Eval Health Prof. 2013 Sep;36(3):279-95. doi: 10.1177/0163278713496426.
6
Do additional recontacts to increase response rate improve physician survey data quality?增加再次联系以提高回复率是否能提高医生调查数据的质量?
Med Care. 2013 Oct;51(10):945-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182a5023d.
7
Using electronic surveys to gather information on physician practices during a response to a local epidemic--Rhode Island, 2011.利用电子调查收集应对地方疫情期间(2011 年,罗德岛州)医生行医信息。
Ann Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;23(8):521-3. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
8
Nonresponse rates are a problematic indicator of nonresponse bias in survey research.无回应率是调查研究中无回应偏差的一个有问题的指标。
Health Serv Res. 2013 Jun;48(3):905-12. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12070.
9
Health care provider surveys in the United States, 2000-2010: a review.美国 2000-2010 年卫生保健提供者调查:综述。
Eval Health Prof. 2013 Mar;36(1):106-26. doi: 10.1177/0163278712474001.
10
Ensuring physicians' competence--is maintenance of certification the answer?确保医生的能力——维持认证是答案吗?
N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 27;367(26):2543-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr1211043.