King E C, Sawner K A
J Allied Health. 1979 Aug;8(3):144-52.
During spring 1977, a survey of all accredited college based educational programs in 11 allied health disciplines was conducted to assess the nature and content of affiliation agreements, attitudes toward affiliation agreements and the extent to which clinical facilities are being reimbursed by academic institutions for providing clinical instruction. This paper summarizes the data across the 11 disciplines. In contrast to prior research, the formal contract emerges as the most frequently used form of agreement. Specific rights and responsibilities of academic and clinical educators, including personal and professional liability insurance, are delineated. Student rights and responsibilities receive less attention. Eight percent of respondents are charged an overall fee for use of clinical facilities; an additional 32% feel that payment may be required in the future. Recommendations include provision for increased attention to student rights and responsibilities and for legal counsel in developing affiliation agreements.
1977年春季，针对11个联合健康学科中所有经认证的基于学院的教育项目开展了一项调查，以评估附属协议的性质和内容、对附属协议的态度，以及学术机构就提供临床教学向临床机构进行补偿的程度。本文总结了这11个学科的数据。与之前的研究不同，正式合同成为最常使用的协议形式。明确了学术和临床教育工作者的具体权利和责任，包括个人和职业责任保险。学生的权利和责任受到的关注较少。8%的受访者因使用临床设施而被收取总费用；另有32%的人认为未来可能需要付费。建议包括在制定附属协议时更多关注学生的权利和责任，并提供法律顾问。
