Kaka J S, Buchanan E C
Hosp Pharm. 1982 May;17(5):270-2.
The feasibility of using Travenol regular and minidrip sets to deliver intravenous solution with IVAC 230 controllers was investigated. Intravariability within Travenol regular sets proved to be negligible. Likewise, intervariability among IVAC controllers is negligible. The least squares fit obtained from drops per minute (dpm) versus flow rate (ml/hr) for Travenol regular sets using dextrose 5% in water was y = 4.50x + 0.8 (r greater than 0.99). Similarly, the least squares fit for sodium chloride 0.9% was y = 4.50x - 0.6 (r greater than 0.99). Therefore, the calculated dpm for the required flow rate for both solutions is similar using Travenol regular sets. Also, no significant difference is found between the drip rate of dextrose 5% in water and sodium chloride 0.9% with Travenol minidrip at 5, 30, and 60 dpms. This study shows that interchangeability of IVAC administration sets with Travenol regular and minidrip sets is possible for dextrose 5% in water and sodium chloride 0.9% solutions.
研究了使用特拉文诺标准输液器和微量输液器与IVAC 230控制器一起输送静脉溶液的可行性。结果表明，特拉文诺标准输液器内部的变异性可忽略不计。同样，IVAC控制器之间的变异性也可忽略不计。使用5%葡萄糖水溶液时，特拉文诺标准输液器每分钟滴数（dpm）与流速（ml/hr）的最小二乘拟合方程为y = 4.50x + 0.8（r大于0.99）。同样，0.9%氯化钠溶液的最小二乘拟合方程为y = 4.50x - 0.6（r大于0.99）。因此，使用特拉文诺标准输液器时，两种溶液所需流速的计算滴数相似。此外，在5、30和60滴/分钟时，5%葡萄糖水溶液和0.9%氯化钠溶液使用特拉文诺微量输液器的滴注速率之间没有显著差异。这项研究表明，对于5%葡萄糖水溶液和0.9%氯化钠溶液，IVAC给药装置与特拉文诺标准输液器和微量输液器可以互换使用。
