Aneshensel C S, Frerichs R R, Clark V A, Yokopenic P A
Public Opin Q. 1982 Spring;46(1):110-21. doi: 10.1086/268703.
Interview method effects in response to the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) are compared among a community sample (N = 546) of adults randomly assigned to either telephone or in-person interviews. The interviews were conducted in Los Angeles during 1980. No significant differences were observed between the two interview methods in nonresponse to symptom items, preference for specific response categories, reliability, mean level of depression, or proportion classified as depressed. Furthermore, no significant interactions were found between sociodemographic characteristics and the method of interview.
在一个随机分配接受电话访谈或面对面访谈的社区成年样本（N = 546）中，比较了访谈方法对流行病学研究中心抑郁量表（CES-D）反应的影响。访谈于1980年在洛杉矶进行。在对症状项目的无应答、对特定应答类别的偏好、信度、抑郁平均水平或被归类为抑郁的比例方面，两种访谈方法之间未观察到显著差异。此外，在社会人口学特征与访谈方法之间未发现显著的交互作用。
