Aneshensel C S, Frerichs R R, Clark V A, Yokopenic P A
Am J Public Health. 1982 Sep;72(9):1017-21. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.9.1017.
Reports of physical morbidity are compared among a community sample of Los Angeles County adults (N = 546) randomly assigned to either in-person or telephone interviews. No statistically significant differences were found between the two interview methods for overall assessment of health status, illnesses reported for the previous four months, or reports of hospitalization. A significantly greater proportion of in-person respondents, however, reported the presence of restricted-activity days during the previous two weeks. This difference could not be directly attributed to sociodemographic characteristics or reported physical health status of the two samples.
在洛杉矶县成年人的社区样本（N = 546）中，对亲自面谈或电话访谈的身体发病率报告进行了比较。在总体健康状况评估、过去四个月报告的疾病或住院报告方面，两种访谈方法之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。然而，亲自面谈的受访者中，报告在前两周内有活动受限天数的比例显著更高。这种差异不能直接归因于两个样本的社会人口学特征或报告的身体健康状况。
