Hackett R D, Bycio P, Guion R M
Acad Manage J. 1989 Jun;32(2):424-53.
For several months, nurses completed ratings of the degree to which certain events relevant to absence were present during each of their scheduled workdays. The event ratings for days when the nurses decided to be absent were then compared with those for days when the nurses attended. As expected, certain events, such as ill health and tiredness, tended to covary and proved to be consistently related to absenteeism across nurses. Also as expected, some events that were not especially relevant for the nurses as a whole, like having a sick family member or friend and concerns about previous poor attendance, nonetheless emerged as being relevant to the absence behavior of certain individuals. Finally, some events were consistently related to the nurses' expressed desire to be absent but not to actual absences. We discuss these differences from two perspectives, one emphasizing the role of attribution bias and the other, a two-stage process in which such bias has no major role.
几个月来，护士们对其每个排班工作日中与缺勤相关的特定事件出现的程度进行评分。然后将护士决定缺勤当天的事件评分与出勤当天的评分进行比较。不出所料，某些事件，如健康不佳和疲劳，往往同时出现，并被证明与护士的缺勤情况始终相关。同样不出所料的是，一些对全体护士来说并非特别相关的事件，比如有生病的家庭成员或朋友以及对之前出勤不佳的担忧，却成为了与某些个体的缺勤行为相关的因素。最后，一些事件与护士表示的缺勤意愿始终相关，但与实际缺勤情况无关。我们从两个角度讨论这些差异，一个角度强调归因偏差的作用，另一个角度是一个两阶段过程，在这个过程中这种偏差没有主要作用。
