• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A cost comparison of intramuscular versus intravenous imipenem.

作者信息

Chin A, Gill M A, Ito M K, Yellin A E, Berne T V, Heseltine P N, Appleman M D

出版信息

Hosp Pharm. 1989 Nov;24(11):905-9.

PMID:10296145
Abstract

Previously reported clinical trials of imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg given intravenously every 6 hours (intravenous group) and imipenem-cilastatin 750 mg given intramuscularly every 12 hours (intramuscular group) were analyzed for relative cost savings. Acquisition costs were significantly higher for the intravenous group for intravenous supplies (30.6 +/- 7.9 dollars) when compared to the intramuscular group (0.98 +/- 0.03 dollars) (p less than 0.05). Also, significantly higher cost (p less than 0.05) was noted for salaries of pharmacists and technicians for manufacturing in the intravenous group (5.8 +/- 1.5 dollars) as compared to the intramuscular group (2.4 +/- 0.7 dollars). Nursing administration costs were greater for the intramuscular group (15.6 +/- 4.8 dollars) when compared to the intravenous group (11.7 +/- 3.0 dollars). Incorporating all appropriate costs, the mean total drug therapy costs (TRX$) were significantly greater (p less than 0.01) for the intravenous group (458.17 +/- 175.17 dollars) as compared to the intramuscular group (298.0 +/- 114.76 dollars). Thus, the dosing of imipenem-cilastatin 750 mg intramuscularly every 12 hours is a more cost effective method of drug delivery with equal efficacy and safety when compared to imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg given intravenously every 6 hours.

摘要

相似文献

1
A cost comparison of intramuscular versus intravenous imipenem.
Hosp Pharm. 1989 Nov;24(11):905-9.
2
Oral ofloxacin versus parenteral imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of osteomyelitis.口服氧氟沙星与静脉注射亚胺培南-西司他丁治疗骨髓炎的对比研究
Rev Esp Quimioter. 1999 Sep;12(3):244-9.
3
Intramuscular imipenem/cilastatin treatment of upper reproductive tract infection in women: efficacy and use characteristics.肌内注射亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗女性上生殖道感染:疗效及使用特征
Chemotherapy. 1991;37 Suppl 2:31-6. doi: 10.1159/000238917.
4
Treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections: comparison of the tolerability and safety of intravenous/oral trovafloxacin versus intravenous imipenem/cilastatin switching to oral amoxycillin/clavulanic acid.
Int J Clin Pract. 1999 Apr-May;53(3):166-73.
5
A randomized, controlled clinical trial on meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin for the treatment of bacterial infections.美罗培南与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗细菌感染的随机对照临床试验
Chin Med J (Engl). 2002 Dec;115(12):1849-54.
6
Multicenter randomized trial comparing meropenem (1.5 g daily) and imipenem/cilastatin (2 g daily) in the hospital treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.多中心随机试验比较美罗培南(每日1.5克)与亚胺培南/西司他丁(每日2克)用于医院治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效。
Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1999;25(6):243-52.
7
Overall clinical utility of the intramuscular preparation of imipenem/cilastatin.亚胺培南/西司他丁肌内注射制剂的总体临床效用。
Chemotherapy. 1991;37 Suppl 2:53-7. doi: 10.1159/000238920.
8
Considerations in comparing intravenous and intramuscular antibiotics.比较静脉注射和肌肉注射抗生素时的注意事项。
Chemotherapy. 1991;37 Suppl 2:1-13. doi: 10.1159/000238912.
9
Intramuscular imipenem/cilastatin in multiple-dose treatment regimens: review of the worldwide clinical experience.多剂量治疗方案中肌肉注射亚胺培南/西司他丁:全球临床经验综述
Chemotherapy. 1991;37 Suppl 2:44-52. doi: 10.1159/000238919.
10
Imipenem/cilastatin with or without glycopeptide as initial antibiotic therapy for recipients of autologous stem cell transplantation: results of a Spanish multicenter study.亚胺培南/西司他丁联合或不联合糖肽类药物作为自体干细胞移植受者初始抗生素治疗的研究:一项西班牙多中心研究的结果
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009 Apr;15(4):512-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.12.505. Epub 2009 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
The optimal choice of medication administration route regarding intravenous, intramuscular, and subcutaneous injection.关于静脉注射、肌肉注射和皮下注射的药物给药途径的最佳选择。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Jul 2;9:923-42. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S87271. eCollection 2015.
2
Drug utilisation review (DUR) of the third generation cephalosporins. Focus on ceftriaxone, ceftazidime and cefotaxime.第三代头孢菌素的药物利用评价。重点关注头孢曲松、头孢他啶和头孢噻肟。
Drugs. 1995 Sep;50(3):423-39. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199550030-00002.