Suppr超能文献

比较静脉注射和肌肉注射抗生素时的注意事项。

Considerations in comparing intravenous and intramuscular antibiotics.

作者信息

Milkovich G, Piazza C J

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Alexandria Hospital, VA 22304.

出版信息

Chemotherapy. 1991;37 Suppl 2:1-13. doi: 10.1159/000238912.

Abstract

With the implementation of prospective payment (e.g. diagnosis-related groups [DRGs] and cost containment efforts, physicians and pharmacists have had to reevaluate current drug delivery systems in the search for the least costly means of administering parenteral products. The following describes a three-phase approach to fully assess relative antibiotic cost and to assess economic efficiencies of intramuscular and intravenous administration of antibiotics. Relative costs of therapy consist of acquisition cost, administration cost and total cost of self-administration. Various intravenous administration systems are described, as are considerations for intramuscular administration. Comparisons are made using intravenous and intramuscular administrations of cefazolin, gentamicin, penicillin and imipenem. Using a 'best case' scenario, the intramuscular route was found to be up to one tenth the expense of the intravenous route in certain instances. Also, the intramuscular route may facilitate early discharge and self-administration in the home. Antibiotics available for intramuscular injection should therefore be considered as an economically efficient alternative to intravenous injections, in appropriate patients.

摘要

随着前瞻性支付(如诊断相关分组[DRGs])的实施以及成本控制措施的推行,医生和药剂师不得不重新评估当前的给药系统,以寻找成本最低的胃肠外给药方式。以下介绍一种分三个阶段的方法,用于全面评估抗生素的相对成本,并评估肌肉注射和静脉注射抗生素的经济效率。治疗的相对成本包括采购成本、给药成本和自我给药的总成本。文中描述了各种静脉给药系统,以及肌肉注射的注意事项。通过对头孢唑林、庆大霉素、青霉素和亚胺培南进行静脉注射和肌肉注射的比较发现,在某些情况下,采用“最佳情况”时,肌肉注射途径的费用可低至静脉注射途径的十分之一。此外,肌肉注射途径可能有助于患者早日出院并在家中进行自我给药。因此,对于合适的患者,可供肌肉注射的抗生素应被视为静脉注射在经济上更有效的替代方式。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验