• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种针对国民保健制度的公共管理方法。

A public management approach to the NHS.

作者信息

Gunn L

出版信息

Health Serv Manage Res. 1989 Mar;2(1):10-9. doi: 10.1177/095148488900200102.

DOI:10.1177/095148488900200102
PMID:10296907
Abstract

This paper considers a public management perspective on management in the public sector. It begins by setting out two contrasting perspectives, those of business management and of public administration. It contends that the present Conservative government has strongly backed a business management approach to the public sector, with the emphasis being placed on the 'Five Es' of economy, efficiency, effectiveness, excellence and enterprise. However, it notes the relative neglect of effectiveness in favour of a rather narrow and short-term concern with economy and efficiency. The paper considers the public administration approach which emphasises the normative differences between the public and private sectors. The paper concludes with an examination of the emerging public management perspective which aims to combine the instrumental insights of business or generic management with the normative orientation of public administration.

摘要

本文从公共管理视角审视公共部门的管理。开篇阐述了两种截然不同的观点,即企业管理观点和公共行政观点。文章认为,当前的保守党政府大力支持公共部门采用企业管理方法,重点在于经济、效率、效能、卓越和创业精神这“五个E”。然而,文章指出,相对而言效能受到忽视,而更侧重于对经济和效率的狭隘且短期的关注。本文探讨了强调公共部门与私营部门规范差异的公共行政方法。文章最后考察了新兴的公共管理视角,该视角旨在将企业或一般管理的工具性见解与公共行政的规范性取向相结合。

相似文献

1
A public management approach to the NHS.一种针对国民保健制度的公共管理方法。
Health Serv Manage Res. 1989 Mar;2(1):10-9. doi: 10.1177/095148488900200102.
2
Is the NHS a business?国民保健制度是一家企业吗?
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 May;64(622):257-8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X679886.
3
Competition versus planning in health care: implications for corporate and individual incentives, efficiency & control.
Aust Health Rev. 1991;14(1):9-34.
4
Special report: ISTCs. Opportunity knocks.特别报道:内侧颞叶癫痫相关认知功能障碍。机会来了。
Health Serv J. 2007 Mar 29;117(6049):26-8.
5
An American in London: the revolution in British medical care.一位身处伦敦的美国人:英国医疗保健的变革
J Am Health Policy. 1992 May-Jun;2(3):29-31.
6
Lessons from America? Commercialization and growth of private medicine in Britain.
Int J Health Serv. 1987;17(2):197-216. doi: 10.2190/7HX5-HFDD-LEJT-CCGV.
7
After the internal market: public ownership or poisoned chalice?内部市场之后:公有制还是有毒的圣杯?
J Manag Med. 1999;13(4-5):346-51. doi: 10.1108/02689239910294682.
8
Can Six Sigma be the "cure" for our "ailing" NHS?六西格玛能成为治愈我们“病态”国民医疗服务体系(NHS)的“良方”吗?
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2007;20(4):242-53.
9
The business of nursing.护理工作
Nurs Times. 2006;102(23):14-7.
10
Public health medicine training and the NHS changes.公共卫生医学培训与英国国家医疗服务体系的变革。
Public Health. 1994 Nov;108(6):457-62. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(94)80104-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Change management in the British National Health Service: a worm's eye critique.英国国民医疗服务体系中的变革管理:自下而上的批判
Health Care Anal. 1996 Aug;4(3):252-8. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1042(199608)4:3<252::aid-hca181>3.0.co;2-y.