• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Are the diagnosis-related group case weights compressed?诊断相关分组病例权重是否被压缩?
Health Care Financ Rev. 1988 Winter;10(2):37-46.
2
How recalibration method, pricing, and coding affect DRG weights.重新校准方法、定价和编码如何影响疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)权重。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1992 Winter;14(2):83-96.
3
A longitudinal comparison of charge-based weights with cost-based weights.基于费用权重与基于成本权重的纵向比较。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1992 Spring;13(3):53-63.
4
Pricing Medicare's diagnosis-related groups: charges versus estimated costs.医疗保险诊断相关组的定价:收费与估计成本
Health Care Financ Rev. 1989 Fall;11(1):79-90.
5
Does one national prospective payment system market basket make sense?一个全国性的前瞻性支付系统市场篮子是否合理?
Health Care Financ Rev. 1988 Winter;10(2):25-35.
6
Trends in hospital labor and total factor productivity, 1981-86.1981 - 1986年医院劳动力与全要素生产率的趋势
Health Care Financ Rev. 1989 Summer;10(4):39-50.
7
Medicare hospital outpatient services and costs: implications for prospective payment.医疗保险医院门诊服务与费用:对预期支付的影响
Health Care Financ Rev. 1992 Winter;14(2):135-49.
8
Comparison of alternative relative weights for diagnosis-related groups.诊断相关组替代相对权重的比较。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1986 Spring;7(3):37-51.
9
Variation in patient routine costliness in U.S. psychiatric facilities.美国精神病治疗机构中患者常规费用的差异。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2005 Mar;8(1):15-28.
10
Using patient age in defining DRGs for Medicare payment.
Inquiry. 1988 Winter;25(4):494-503.

引用本文的文献

1
Adjusting case mix payment amounts for inaccurately reported comorbidity data.调整病例组合支付金额以纠正不准确报告的合并症数据。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2010 Mar;13(1):65-73. doi: 10.1007/s10729-009-9112-0.
2
Cost weight compression: impact of cost data precision and completeness.成本权重压缩:成本数据精度和完整性的影响
Health Care Financ Rev. 2006 Spring;27(3):111-22.
3
Methods to determine reimbursement rates for diagnosis related groups (DRG): a comparison of nine European countries.诊断相关分组(DRG)报销费率的确定方法:九个欧洲国家的比较
Health Care Manag Sci. 2006 Aug;9(3):215-23. doi: 10.1007/s10729-006-9040-1.
4
Pricing Medicare's diagnosis-related groups: charges versus estimated costs.医疗保险诊断相关组的定价:收费与估计成本
Health Care Financ Rev. 1989 Fall;11(1):79-90.
5
How recalibration method, pricing, and coding affect DRG weights.重新校准方法、定价和编码如何影响疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)权重。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1992 Winter;14(2):83-96.
6
A longitudinal comparison of charge-based weights with cost-based weights.基于费用权重与基于成本权重的纵向比较。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1992 Spring;13(3):53-63.
7
Comparison of alternative weight recalibration methods for diagnosis-related groups.用于诊断相关分组的替代权重重新校准方法的比较
Health Care Financ Rev. 1990 Winter;12(2):87-101.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of alternative relative weights for diagnosis-related groups.诊断相关组替代相对权重的比较。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1986 Spring;7(3):37-51.
2
Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) and Medicare reimbursement.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE II)及医疗保险报销。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1984;Suppl(Suppl):91-105.
3
Effects of teaching on hospital costs.教学对医院成本的影响。
J Health Econ. 1983 Mar;2(1):1-28. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(83)90009-7.
4
Reliability and validity in hospital case-mix measurement.医院病例组合测量中的可靠性与有效性。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1982 Dec;4(2):101-28.
5
Hospital ownership and performance.医院所有权与绩效。
Econ Inq. 1985 Jan;23(1):21-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1985.tb01750.x.
6
Physician DRGs.
N Engl J Med. 1985 Sep 12;313(11):670-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198509123131106.
7
Is compression occurring in DRG prices?DRG价格中是否存在压缩现象?
Inquiry. 1985 Summer;22(2):142-7.

诊断相关分组病例权重是否被压缩?

Are the diagnosis-related group case weights compressed?

作者信息

Thorpe K E, Cretin S, Keeler E B

出版信息

Health Care Financ Rev. 1988 Winter;10(2):37-46.

PMID:10313085
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4192921/
Abstract

One problem noted recently with the diagnosis-related group payment system is that the distribution of Medicare case weights and case-mix indexes are compressed; that is, the payment rates for high-cost procedures are too low and those for low-cost procedures are too high. Despite the attention compression has received, there are no direct estimates of its magnitude or importance. Presented in this article are an empirical test for compression and a suggestion for a simple correction to decompress the relative prices.

摘要

最近发现的与诊断相关分组支付系统有关的一个问题是,医疗保险病例权重和病例组合指数的分布被压缩了;也就是说,高成本程序的支付率过低,而低成本程序的支付率过高。尽管压缩问题已受到关注,但尚无对其规模或重要性的直接估计。本文给出了对压缩的实证检验以及对相对价格进行简单校正以解除压缩的建议。