• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cost weight compression: impact of cost data precision and completeness.成本权重压缩：成本数据精度和完整性的影响
Health Care Financ Rev. 2006 Spring;27(3):111-22.
2
Variation in patient routine costliness in U.S. psychiatric facilities.美国精神病治疗机构中患者常规费用的差异。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2005 Mar;8(1):15-28.
3
The effects of ownership and ownership change on nursing home industry costs.所有权及所有权变更对疗养院行业成本的影响。
Health Serv Res. 1996 Aug;31(3):327-46.
4
Determining cost of direct nursing care by DRGs.通过诊断相关分组确定直接护理成本。
Nurs Manage. 1984 Apr;15(4):29-32.
5
DRGs and nursing care.疾病诊断相关分组与护理
ANA Publ. 1985 Sep(D-86):i-vi, 1-65.
6
DRG-based per diem payment system matches costs more accurately.基于疾病诊断相关分组的每日支付系统能更准确地匹配成本。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1999 Apr;53(4):42-6.
7
Simulating the impact of case-mix adjusted hospice rates.模拟病例组合调整后的临终关怀费率的影响。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1986 Winter;8(2):53-64.
8
Implementing DRGs in critical care nursing.在重症护理中实施疾病诊断相关分组（DRGs）
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 1985 Mar-Apr;4(2):67-8.
9
Looking at the meaning of DRGs.审视疾病诊断相关分组的含义。
Aust J Adv Nurs. 1984;2(2):4-12.
10
Testing an inpatient nursing intensity billing model.测试一种住院护理强度计费模式。
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2008 May;9(2):103-11. doi: 10.1177/1527154408320045.

引用本文的文献

1
Billing models for measuring nursing care in inpatient and outpatient settings: a scoping review.住院和门诊环境中衡量护理服务的计费模式：一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 17;25(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12116-3.
2
The development of inpatient cost and nursing service weights in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia.马来西亚一家三级医院住院费用和护理服务权重的发展。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct 14;20(1):945. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05776-4.
3
Adjusting case mix payment amounts for inaccurately reported comorbidity data.调整病例组合支付金额以纠正不准确报告的合并症数据。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2010 Mar;13(1):65-73. doi: 10.1007/s10729-009-9112-0.
4
A mixture model approach to updating payment weights with an application to ICD-10 implementation.一种用于更新支付权重的混合模型方法及其在ICD - 10实施中的应用。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2006 Nov;9(4):349-57. doi: 10.1007/s10729-006-9999-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Using computerised patient-level costing data for setting DRG weights: the Victorian (Australia) cost weight studies.利用计算机化的患者层面成本核算数据来设定疾病诊断相关分组（DRG）权重：澳大利亚维多利亚州成本权重研究
Health Policy. 2001 May;56(2):149-63. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(00)00148-2.
2
Pricing Medicare's diagnosis-related groups: charges versus estimated costs.医疗保险诊断相关组的定价：收费与估计成本
Health Care Financ Rev. 1989 Fall;11(1):79-90.
3
Are the diagnosis-related group case weights compressed?诊断相关分组病例权重是否被压缩？
Health Care Financ Rev. 1988 Winter;10(2):37-46.
4
Comparison of alternative relative weights for diagnosis-related groups.诊断相关组替代相对权重的比较。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1986 Spring;7(3):37-51.
5
How recalibration method, pricing, and coding affect DRG weights.重新校准方法、定价和编码如何影响疾病诊断相关分组（DRG）权重。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1992 Winter;14(2):83-96.
6
A longitudinal comparison of charge-based weights with cost-based weights.基于费用权重与基于成本权重的纵向比较。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1992 Spring;13(3):53-63.
7
The ratio of costs to charges: how good a basis for estimating costs?成本与收费之比：估算成本的依据有多可靠？
Inquiry. 1995;32(4):476-81.
8
Is compression occurring in DRG prices?DRG价格中是否存在压缩现象？
Inquiry. 1985 Summer;22(2):142-7.

成本权重压缩：成本数据精度和完整性的影响

Cost weight compression: impact of cost data precision and completeness.

作者信息

Botz Charles K, Sutherland Jason, Lawrenson Jolyn

机构信息

London Health Sciences Center, University Campus, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Health Care Financ Rev. 2006 Spring;27(3):111-22.

PMID:17290652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4194951/
Abstract

This study was designed to quantitatively assess the impact of deficiencies in completeness and precision of hospital case cost data on cost weight compression. For the nursing per diem model versus the nursing workload model the average compression was 19.6 percent (for the 25.9 percent of cases that changed cost weight by at least 5 percent). We concluded that the compression of case mix cost weights based on nursing per diem cost or per diem charge models, such as for U.S. diagnosis-related groups (DRGs), may be pervasive and material.

摘要

本研究旨在定量评估医院病例成本数据的完整性和精确性不足对成本权重压缩的影响。对于护理每日费用模型与护理工作量模型，平均压缩率为19.6%（对于成本权重至少变化5%的25.9%的病例）。我们得出结论，基于护理每日费用成本或每日收费模型（如美国诊断相关组（DRG））的病例组合成本权重压缩可能普遍存在且影响重大。