• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调整病例组合支付金额以纠正不准确报告的合并症数据。

Adjusting case mix payment amounts for inaccurately reported comorbidity data.

机构信息

The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, 35 Centerra Parkway, Suite 110, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA.

出版信息

Health Care Manag Sci. 2010 Mar;13(1):65-73. doi: 10.1007/s10729-009-9112-0.

DOI:10.1007/s10729-009-9112-0
PMID:20402283
Abstract

Case mix methods such as diagnosis related groups have become a basis of payment for inpatient hospitalizations in many countries. Specifying cost weight values for case mix system payment has important consequences; recent evidence suggests case mix cost weight inaccuracies influence the supply of some hospital-based services. To begin to address the question of case mix cost weight accuracy, this paper is motivated by the objective of improving the accuracy of cost weight values due to inaccurate or incomplete comorbidity data. The methods are suitable to case mix methods that incorporate disease severity or comorbidity adjustments. The methods are based on the availability of detailed clinical and cost information linked at the patient level and leverage recent results from clinical data audits. A Bayesian framework is used to synthesize clinical data audit information regarding misclassification probabilities into cost weight value calculations. The models are implemented through Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. An example used to demonstrate the methods finds that inaccurate comorbidity data affects cost weight values by biasing cost weight values (and payments) downward. The implications for hospital payments are discussed and the generalizability of the approach is explored.

摘要

病例组合方法(如诊断相关分组)已成为许多国家住院患者支付的基础。为病例组合系统支付指定成本权重值具有重要意义;最近的证据表明,病例组合成本权重不准确会影响某些基于医院的服务供应。为了开始解决病例组合成本权重准确性的问题,本文的目的是提高由于合并症数据不准确或不完整而导致的成本权重值的准确性。这些方法适用于包含疾病严重程度或合并症调整的病例组合方法。这些方法基于详细的临床和成本信息的可用性,并利用最近的临床数据审计结果。使用贝叶斯框架将临床数据审计信息中关于分类错误概率的信息综合到成本权重值的计算中。模型通过马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗方法实现。用于演示方法的示例发现,不准确的合并症数据会通过向下偏差成本权重值(和付款)来影响成本权重值。讨论了对医院付款的影响,并探讨了该方法的可推广性。

相似文献

1
Adjusting case mix payment amounts for inaccurately reported comorbidity data.调整病例组合支付金额以纠正不准确报告的合并症数据。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2010 Mar;13(1):65-73. doi: 10.1007/s10729-009-9112-0.
2
Coding response to a case-mix measurement system based on multiple diagnoses.基于多重诊断的病例组合测量系统的编码响应
Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 1):1027-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00270.x.
3
The effect of misclassification errors on case mix measurement.错误分类误差对病例组合测量的影响。
Health Policy. 2006 Dec;79(2-3):195-202. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.12.012. Epub 2006 Jan 24.
4
Practice patterns, case mix, Medicare payment policy, and dialysis facility costs.实践模式、病例组合、医疗保险支付政策和透析设施成本。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Feb;33(6):1567-92.
5
Case mix adjusted nursing-home reimbursement: a critical review of the evidence.病例组合调整后的养老院报销:证据的批判性综述。
Milbank Q. 1992;70(3):455-90.
6
Variation in patient routine costliness in U.S. psychiatric facilities.美国精神病治疗机构中患者常规费用的差异。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2005 Mar;8(1):15-28.
7
Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2007 rates; fiscal year 2007 occupational mix adjustment to wage index; health care infrastructure improvement program; selection criteria of loan program for qualifying hospitals engaged in cancer-related health care and forgiveness of indebtedness; and exclusion of vendor purchases made under the competitive acquisition program (CAP) for outpatient drugs and biologicals under part B for the purpose of calculating the average sales price (ASP). Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.医疗保险计划;医院 inpatient 预期支付系统及 2007 财年费率的变更;2007 财年工资指数的职业构成调整;医疗保健基础设施改善计划;参与癌症相关医疗保健的合格医院贷款计划的选择标准及债务免除;以及在计算平均销售价格(ASP)时排除根据 B 部分门诊药品和生物制品的竞争性采购计划(CAP)进行的供应商采购。最终规则及有意见征求期的暂行最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2006 Aug 18;71(160):47869-8351.
8
A systematic review of case-mix models for home health care payment: Making sense of variation.家庭医疗保健支付的病例组合模型系统评价:理解变化。
Health Policy. 2020 Feb;124(2):121-132. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.12.012. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
9
Restructuring in response to case mix reimbursement in nursing homes: a contingency approach.疗养院针对病例组合报销的重组:一种权变方法。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2008 Apr-Jun;33(2):113-23. doi: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000304506.12556.52.
10
The effect of case-mix adjustment on admission-based reimbursement.病例组合调整对基于住院的报销的影响。
Health Serv Res. 1983 Summer;18(2 Pt 1):209-32.

引用本文的文献

1
European Society for Swallowing Disorders - European Union Geriatric Medicine Society white paper: oropharyngeal dysphagia as a geriatric syndrome.欧洲吞咽障碍协会 - 欧盟老年医学学会白皮书:作为老年综合征的口咽吞咽困难
Clin Interv Aging. 2016 Oct 7;11:1403-1428. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S107750. eCollection 2016.
2
Using electronic patient records to discover disease correlations and stratify patient cohorts.利用电子病历发现疾病相关性并对患者队列进行分层。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Aug;7(8):e1002141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002141. Epub 2011 Aug 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Hospital factors associated with clinical data quality.与临床数据质量相关的医院因素。
Health Policy. 2009 Aug;91(3):321-6. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.01.007. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
2
Paying accurately for imaging services in medicare.准确支付医疗保险中的影像服务费用。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Nov-Dec;27(6):1479-90. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1479.
3
The impact of using different costing methods on the results of an economic evaluation of cardiac care: microcosting vs gross-costing approaches.采用不同成本核算方法对心脏护理经济评估结果的影响:微观成本核算与宏观成本核算方法对比
Health Econ. 2009 Apr;18(4):377-88. doi: 10.1002/hec.1363.
4
Methodology, design, and analytic techniques to address measurement of comorbid disease.用于解决共病测量问题的方法学、设计和分析技术。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007 Mar;62(3):281-5. doi: 10.1093/gerona/62.3.281.
5
Cost weight compression: impact of cost data precision and completeness.成本权重压缩:成本数据精度和完整性的影响
Health Care Financ Rev. 2006 Spring;27(3):111-22.
6
Getting the price right: Medicare payment rates for cardiovascular services.确定合理价格:医疗保险心血管服务支付费率
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Jan-Feb;26(1):124-36. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.1.124.
7
Recalibrating Medicare payments for inpatient care.重新校准医疗保险对住院治疗的支付标准。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 16;355(20):2061-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp068203.
8
Hospital case payment systems in Europe.欧洲的医院病例支付系统。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2006 Aug;9(3):211-3. doi: 10.1007/s10729-006-9039-7.
9
The risk of upcoding in casemix systems: a comparative study.病例组合系统中高编的风险:一项比较研究。
Health Policy. 2007 May;81(2-3):289-99. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.06.002. Epub 2006 Aug 14.
10
The effect of misclassification errors on case mix measurement.错误分类误差对病例组合测量的影响。
Health Policy. 2006 Dec;79(2-3):195-202. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.12.012. Epub 2006 Jan 24.