Bacaltchuk J, Trefiglio R P, de Oliveira I R, Lima M S, Mari J J
Department of Psychiatry, Federal University of São Paulo, Paulista School of Medicine (UNIFESP-EPM), Brazil.
J Clin Pharm Ther. 1999 Feb;24(1):23-31. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2710.1999.00192.x.
To assess the efficacy and acceptability of antidepressants compared to psychotherapy as single approaches for the treatment of bulimia nervosa.
Dichotomous outcomes were analysed by calculating relative risks and continuous outcomes by calculating effect sizes. The number needed to treat (or harm) was calculated. Methodological quality of trials and heterogeneity in the results were evaluated.
A meta-analysis including five randomized controlled trials showed a non-significant difference in short-term remission of bulimic symptoms favouring psychotherapy. Remission rates were 20% for antidepressants and 39% for psychotherapy (P = 0.07). Dropout rates were higher (P = 0.027) for antidepressants (40%) than for psychotherapy (18%). The number needed to harm (NNH) was 4.
Psychotherapy was superior to antidepressants, but using a more conservative statistical approach this difference, although clinically relevant, was not significant. The number of trials might be insufficient to show the significance of a 20% absolute risk reduction in efficacy. Psychotherapy was a better accepted treatment.
评估抗抑郁药与心理治疗作为治疗神经性贪食症单一方法的疗效和可接受性。
通过计算相对风险分析二分结果,通过计算效应量分析连续结果。计算治疗(或伤害)所需人数。评估试验的方法学质量和结果的异质性。
一项纳入五项随机对照试验的荟萃分析显示,在神经性贪食症状的短期缓解方面,心理治疗更具优势,但差异无统计学意义。抗抑郁药的缓解率为20%,心理治疗为39%(P = 0.07)。抗抑郁药的脱落率(40%)高于心理治疗(18%)(P = 0.027)。伤害所需人数(NNH)为4。
心理治疗优于抗抑郁药,但采用更保守的统计方法,这种差异虽然具有临床相关性,但无统计学意义。试验数量可能不足以显示疗效上20%的绝对风险降低的显著性。心理治疗是一种更易被接受的治疗方法。