Suppr超能文献

与化学沉淀法相比,液体均相高密度脂蛋白胆固醇检测方法的参考标准化及分析性能

Reference standardization and analytical performance of a liquid homogeneous high-density lipoprotein cholesterol method compared with chemical precipitation method.

作者信息

Halloran P, Roetering H, Pisani T, van den Berg B, Cobbaert C

机构信息

Diagnostics Research and Development, Genzyme Diagnostics, Cambridge, Mass 02139, USA.

出版信息

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1999 Apr;123(4):317-26. doi: 10.5858/1999-123-0317-RSAAPO.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels as a risk factor for coronary heart disease necessitates an accurate and precise method for measuring HDL-C. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention HDL-C reference method (RM) and designated comparison method (DCM) are time-consuming, expensive, and impractical for routine clinical use. We evaluated the Liquid N-geneous (LN-gen) HDL-C assay (Genzyme Diagnostics, Cambridge, Mass) to determine if this homogeneous reagent meets the National Cholesterol Education Program requirements for HDL-C evaluation.

DESIGN

Accuracy of the LN-gen HDL-C assay was compared in combination with phosphotungstic acid (PTA) precipitation with DCM HDL-C for normotriglyceridemic serum specimens (triglycerides < 2.0 g/L) and with RM HDL-C for specimens with triglycerides levels > or = 2.0 g/L.

SETTING

Genzyme Diagnostics (with RM and DCM assayed by Pacific BioMetrics Inc, Seattle, Wash) and the Lipid Reference Laboratory of the University Hospital Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

RESULTS

Linear regression to DCM (n = 90) was (LN-gen = 1.015 DCM + 0.01 g/L, r = 0.993, SE = 0.015 g/L) and (PTA = 1.004 DCM - 0.017 g/L, r = 0.980, SE = 0.025 g/L), with a mean percent bias to DCM of 3.3% and -2.8% for LN-gen and PTA, respectively. The comparison with RM (n = 69) showed an increased mean bias for PTA (-5.8%) as compared with LN-gen (1.5%). The correlation and regression equations were (LN-gen = 1.020 RM - 0.002 g/L, r = 0.985, SE = 0.017 g/L) and (PTA = 1.042 RM - 0.032 g/L, r = 0.984, SE = 0.018 g/L). The precision of LN-gen was confirmed at < 2.1% coefficient of variation, and the total error was calculated to be < or = 7.7% for both normotriglyceride and elevated triglyceride specimens at HDL-C decision points of 0.35 g/L and 0.60 g/L.

CONCLUSIONS

The LN-gen HDL-C assay offers a cost-effective convenient method for meeting the 1998 precision, bias, and total error recommendations of the National Cholesterol Education Program.

摘要

背景

将高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)水平用作冠心病的危险因素,需要一种准确且精确的HDL-C测量方法。疾病控制与预防中心的HDL-C参考方法(RM)和指定比较方法(DCM)耗时、昂贵,且不适合常规临床应用。我们评估了液态均相(LN-gen)HDL-C检测法(Genzyme Diagnostics公司,马萨诸塞州剑桥),以确定这种均相试剂是否符合国家胆固醇教育计划对HDL-C评估的要求。

设计

将LN-gen HDL-C检测法与磷钨酸(PTA)沉淀法相结合,分别针对正常甘油三酯血症血清标本(甘油三酯<2.0 g/L)与DCM HDL-C进行比较,针对甘油三酯水平≥2.0 g/L的标本与RM HDL-C进行比较,评估LN-gen HDL-C检测法的准确性。

地点

Genzyme Diagnostics公司(由华盛顿州西雅图的Pacific BioMetrics公司进行RM和DCM检测)以及荷兰鹿特丹大学医院脂质参考实验室。

结果

与DCM相比(n = 90),线性回归结果为(LN-gen = 1.015 DCM + 0.01 g/L,r = 0.993,SE = 0.015 g/L)以及(PTA = 1.004 DCM - 0.017 g/L,r = 0.980,SE = 0.025 g/L),LN-gen和PTA相对于DCM的平均偏差百分比分别为3.3%和 -2.8%。与RM相比(n = 69),PTA的平均偏差(-5.8%)高于LN-gen(1.5%)。相关及回归方程分别为(LN-gen = 1.020 RM - 0.002 g/L,r = 0.985,SE = 0.017 g/L)以及(PTA = 1.042 RM - 0.032 g/L,r = 0.984,SE = 0.018 g/L)。LN-gen的精密度在变异系数<2.1%时得到确认,对于HDL-C判定点为0.35 g/L和0.60 g/L的正常甘油三酯和甘油三酯升高的标本,计算得出的总误差均≤7.7%。

结论

LN-gen HDL-C检测法提供了一种经济高效且便捷的方法,可满足国家胆固醇教育计划1998年对精密度、偏差和总误差的建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验