Zhao Wei, Chaffin Carolyn, Desmond Renee A, Hodges Bruce, Daly Thomas M, Andrew Robinson C, Hardy Robert W
Department of Pathology, Division of Laboratory Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294-0007, USA.
J Clin Lab Anal. 2004;18(1):42-4. doi: 10.1002/jcla.20000.
Direct HDL-cholesterol (HDLc) assays have several advantages over other assays that are more laborious and time-consuming. A recent College of American Pathologists (CAP) report indicates that at least 385 Beckman LX-20 analyzers use the selective detergent (homogeneous or direct) method for analyzing HDLc. There is no published evaluation of direct HDLc assays on the Beckman platform. Here we report our evaluation of a direct HDLc assay marketed by Beckman for the Beckman LX-20 analyzers. In general, the assay performed well; however, the total error was not within National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) guidelines. This was largely because of a significant positive bias that appeared to be due, at least in part, to triglycerides. This bias was worse at HDLc concentrations <40 mg/dL, which may make it difficult to identify a low HDLc concentration and consequently an increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD).
直接高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDLc)检测方法相对于其他更繁琐且耗时的检测方法具有多个优势。美国病理学家学会(CAP)最近的一份报告表明,至少有385台贝克曼LX - 20分析仪使用选择性去污剂(均相或直接)法来分析HDLc。目前尚无关于贝克曼平台上直接HDLc检测方法的已发表评估报告。在此,我们报告我们对贝克曼为贝克曼LX - 20分析仪销售的一种直接HDLc检测方法的评估。总体而言,该检测方法表现良好;然而,总误差不在国家胆固醇教育计划(NCEP)指南范围内。这主要是由于存在显著的正偏差,这似乎至少部分归因于甘油三酯。在HDLc浓度<40 mg/dL时这种偏差更严重,这可能使得难以识别低HDLc浓度,进而难以确定心血管疾病(CVD)风险的增加。