Yii N W, Patel S G, Williamson P, Breach N M
Head and Neck Unit at Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999 May;103(6):1655-60. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199905060-00012.
Neck dissection is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in the management of head and neck cancer. Different skin incisions with various modifications have been described in the literature. Three commonly used but conceptually different incisions were compared with respect to the incidence of wound dehiscence in a retrospective review. There were 166 patients with 184 neck dissections carried out using a triradiate (n = 85), modified MacFee (n = 25), or an apron flap incision (n = 74). The incidence of wound dehiscence in the three groups was 11 percent, 8 percent, and 0 percent for the triradiate, modified MacFee, and apron flap incisions, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of wound dehiscence between the apron flap incision and the triradiate incision groups (p = 0.004). The difference in wound dehiscence was not statistically significant between the apron flap incision and the modified MacFee incision groups (p = 0.06). Overall, there was a significant increase in the incidence of wound dehiscence in previously irradiated necks (p = 0.02), but this was significant only for the triradiate incision (p = 0.005) when analyzed individually. Comparison of triradiate, apron, and MacFee incisions did not show a statistically significant difference between the incisions with regard to other postoperative complications in terms of seroma, hematoma, wound infection, and fistula formation. The apron flap incision is the recommended approach in the presence of previous neck irradiation as it gives easier access than the MacFee incision. The robustness of the flap is because of the absence of a trifurcate point as well as a good vascular supply arising from arterial territory of the external carotid artery.
颈部清扫术是头颈癌治疗中最常施行的外科手术之一。文献中描述了多种不同的皮肤切口及其各种改良方式。在一项回顾性研究中,对三种常用但概念不同的切口在伤口裂开发生率方面进行了比较。166例患者共进行了184例颈部清扫术,其中采用三辐射状切口(n = 85)、改良麦克菲切口(n = 25)或围裙状皮瓣切口(n = 74)。三辐射状切口、改良麦克菲切口和围裙状皮瓣切口组的伤口裂开发生率分别为11%、8%和0%。围裙状皮瓣切口组与三辐射状切口组在伤口裂开发生率上存在统计学显著差异(p = 0.004)。围裙状皮瓣切口组与改良麦克菲切口组在伤口裂开方面的差异无统计学意义(p = 0.06)。总体而言,既往接受过放疗的颈部伤口裂开发生率显著增加(p = 0.02),但单独分析时仅三辐射状切口有显著差异(p = 0.005)。在血清肿、血肿、伤口感染和瘘管形成等其他术后并发症方面,三辐射状切口、围裙状切口和麦克菲切口的比较未显示出切口之间存在统计学显著差异。在既往颈部接受过放疗的情况下,推荐采用围裙状皮瓣切口,因为它比麦克菲切口更容易操作。皮瓣的稳固性源于没有三叉点以及来自颈外动脉供血区域的良好血供。