• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重创伤性损伤后的压疮风险

Pressure ulcer risk following critical traumatic injury.

作者信息

Baldwin K M, Ziegler S M

机构信息

University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.

出版信息

Adv Wound Care. 1998 Jul-Aug;11(4):168-73.

PMID:10326336
Abstract

Previously healthy, critically injured survivors of serious trauma are at risk for developing pressure ulcers. A prospective, descriptive, clinical research study was designed to identify the factors associated with the incidence, number, stage, and location of pressure ulcers and to assess the predictive validity of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk in this population. A sample of 36 patients was assessed biweekly throughout hospitalization and showed a pressure ulcer incidence of 30.6%. The small sample size in this study precludes generalization of results. However, several findings have potential implications for clinical practice if they can be replicated in larger studies. Total Braden Scale scores were lower for all assessment points in all subjects who developed pressure ulcers. Subscale scores varied in predictive ability from 100% to 0%. Logistic regression using the first two assessment points produced a model that combined mobility and moisture subscale scores. This model correctly predicted 77.78% of those subjects who developed pressure ulcers.

摘要

先前健康的严重创伤危重伤者有发生压疮的风险。一项前瞻性、描述性临床研究旨在确定与压疮发生率、数量、分期和部位相关的因素,并评估Braden压疮风险预测量表在该人群中的预测效度。在整个住院期间,每两周对36例患者进行一次评估,结果显示压疮发生率为30.6%。本研究样本量较小,无法将结果推广。然而,如果能在更大规模的研究中得到重复,一些研究结果可能对临床实践具有潜在意义。所有发生压疮的受试者在所有评估点的Braden量表总分均较低。各子量表的预测能力从100%到0%不等。使用前两个评估点进行逻辑回归分析得出一个模型,该模型综合了活动能力和潮湿程度子量表得分。该模型正确预测了77.78%发生压疮的受试者。

相似文献

1
Pressure ulcer risk following critical traumatic injury.严重创伤性损伤后的压疮风险
Adv Wound Care. 1998 Jul-Aug;11(4):168-73.
2
Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.在中国内地的急症医院中,使用改良版Braden量表、Braden量表和Norton量表预测压疮风险。
Appl Nurs Res. 2005 May;18(2):122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2005.01.001.
3
Predicting the risk of pressure ulcers in critically ill patients.预测重症患者发生压疮的风险。
Am J Crit Care. 1999 Jul;8(4):262-9.
4
Development of a new risk assessment scale for predicting pressure ulcers in an intensive care unit.一种用于预测重症监护病房压疮的新风险评估量表的开发。
Nurs Crit Care. 2008 Jan-Feb;13(1):34-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2007.00250.x.
5
Pressure ulcer risk assessment immediately after cardiac surgery--does it make a difference? A comparison of three pressure ulcer risk assessment instruments within a cardiac surgery population.心脏手术后立即进行压疮风险评估——会有不同吗?心脏手术人群中三种压疮风险评估工具的比较。
Nurs Crit Care. 2007 Jan-Feb;12(1):42-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2006.00198.x.
6
Factors affecting the predictive validity of the Braden Scale.影响Braden量表预测效度的因素。
Adv Wound Care. 1996 Nov-Dec;9(6):32-6.
7
A clinical trial of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk.用于预测压疮风险的Braden量表的一项临床试验。
Nurs Clin North Am. 1987 Jun;22(2):417-28.
8
Predicting and preventing pressure ulcers in adults with paralysis.预测和预防瘫痪成人的压疮
Adv Wound Care. 1998 Sep;11(5):237-46.
9
Risk-assessment tools in the prevention of pressure ulcers.预防压疮的风险评估工具。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 1999 Feb;45(2):20-6, 28, 30-4.
10
Assessing predictive validity of the modified Braden scale for prediction of pressure ulcer risk of orthopaedic patients in an acute care setting.评估改良版Braden量表在急性护理环境中对骨科患者压疮风险预测的预测效度。
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Jun;18(11):1565-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02757.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The Psychometric Properties of the Braden Scale to Assess Pressure Injury Risk in Acute Care: A Systematic Review.用于评估急性护理中压力性损伤风险的Braden量表的心理测量特性:一项系统综述。
J Clin Nurs. 2025 Oct;34(10):4055-4073. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17862. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
2
Predictive validity of the braden scale for pressure injury risk assessment in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Braden 量表评估成人压力性损伤风险的预测效度:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nurs Open. 2021 Sep;8(5):2194-2207. doi: 10.1002/nop2.792. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
3
Multivariate analysis of early surgical management factors affecting posttraumatic penoscrotal avulsion injury: a level I trauma center study.
多因素分析影响创伤性阴囊阴茎离断伤早期外科处理的因素:Ⅰ级创伤中心研究。
BMC Urol. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00763-7.
4
Pressure Ulcer in Trauma Patients: A Higher Spinal Cord Injury Level Leads to Higher Risk.创伤患者的压疮:脊髓损伤水平越高,风险越高。
J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec. 2018 Jun 19;9(1-3):24-31.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jccw.2018.06.001. eCollection 2017.
5
Pressure ulcers in trauma patients with suspected spine injury: a prospective cohort study with emphasis on device-related pressure ulcers.创伤合并疑似脊柱损伤患者的压疮:一项以器械相关性压疮为重点的前瞻性队列研究。
Int Wound J. 2017 Feb;14(1):104-111. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12568. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
6
Development and feasibility of an automated call monitoring intervention for older wheelchair users: the MOvIT project.针对老年轮椅使用者的自动通话监测干预措施的开发与可行性研究:MOvIT项目
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Sep 16;15:386. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1048-0.