Suppr超能文献

用于预测压疮风险的Braden量表的一项临床试验。

A clinical trial of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk.

作者信息

Bergstrom N, Demuth P J, Braden B J

出版信息

Nurs Clin North Am. 1987 Jun;22(2):417-28.

PMID:3554150
Abstract

The purpose of this article was to describe the protocol by which predictive instruments can be tested for validity and to evaluate the usefulness of an instrument for predicting pressure sore risk in an AICU. The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk was described. Methods for measuring predictive validity and for calculating sensitivity, specificity, and per cent predictive value of positive and negative tests were discussed. Sixty consecutively admitted AICU patients who were pressure sore free were rated for pressure sore risk within 24 to 72 hours after admission. The skin condition of each patient was systematically assessed every 2 days. Twenty-four subjects developed pressure sores during the study period. The critical cut-off point at which the patient could be judged to be at risk for pressure sore formation was a Braden Scale score equal to or less than 16. The sensitivity and specificity of the scale at this score were 83 to 64 per cent, respectively. The per cent predictive value of a positive and negative test were 61 and 85 per cent, respectively. The Braden Scale compared favorably with the Norton Scale in respect to sensitivity. The specificity, or the tendency of a scale to overpredict, was greater for the Norton than for the Braden Scale. The Norton Scale overpredicted by 64 per cent, whereas the Braden Scale overpredicted by 36 per cent. This difference may be important clinically if all patients who were judged to be at risk received additional nursing care or protective devices. A greater number of patients may receive unnecessary and expensive treatments using the Norton Scale.

摘要

本文旨在描述可用于测试预测工具有效性的方案,并评估一种工具在急性重症监护病房(AICU)中预测压疮风险的实用性。文中介绍了用于预测压疮风险的Braden量表。讨论了测量预测效度以及计算阳性和阴性测试的敏感性、特异性和预测值百分比的方法。对60例连续收治且无压疮的AICU患者在入院后24至72小时内进行压疮风险评估。每2天对每位患者的皮肤状况进行系统评估。在研究期间,有24名受试者发生了压疮。判断患者有发生压疮风险的临界截断点是Braden量表评分等于或低于16分。在此评分下,该量表的敏感性和特异性分别为83%和64%。阳性和阴性测试的预测值百分比分别为61%和85%。在敏感性方面,Braden量表优于Norton量表。Norton量表的特异性,即量表过度预测的倾向,高于Braden量表。Norton量表过度预测了64%,而Braden量表过度预测了36%。如果所有被判定有风险的患者都接受额外的护理或防护设备,这种差异在临床上可能很重要。使用Norton量表可能会有更多患者接受不必要且昂贵的治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验