• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会困境中的社会规范与合作:情境与反馈的影响

Social Norms and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: The Effects of Context and Feedback.

作者信息

Pillutla MM, Chen XP

机构信息

Department of Management of Organizations, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong

出版信息

Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999 May;78(2):81-103. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2825.

DOI:10.1006/obhd.1999.2825
PMID:10329296
Abstract

Drawing from research on social norms, we proposed and tested the hypothesis that people behave more competitively in social dilemmas involving economic decisions compared to those involving noneconomic decisions. We also proposed that people would compete more if they see that others have unexpectedly competed in a prior situation and cooperate more when others have unexpectedly cooperated in a previous situation. Further, we hypothesized that if others behave consistently with expectations, such behaviors (either cooperative or competitive) would not affect subsequent behavior. One hundred ninety-five under graduate students participated in an experiment in which they made choices in two different social dilemma games. Results support the hypotheses, and the discussion addresses the implications of the study for research on social norms and decision making. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

摘要

基于对社会规范的研究,我们提出并检验了这样一个假设:在涉及经济决策的社会困境中,人们的行为比在涉及非经济决策的社会困境中更具竞争性。我们还提出,如果人们看到其他人在前一种情况下意外地选择了竞争,那么他们会更倾向于竞争;而当其他人在前一种情况下意外地选择了合作时,他们会更多地选择合作。此外,我们假设,如果其他人的行为符合预期,那么这种行为(无论是合作还是竞争)都不会影响后续行为。195名本科生参与了一项实验,他们在两个不同的社会困境游戏中做出选择。结果支持了这些假设,并且讨论部分阐述了该研究对社会规范和决策研究的意义。版权所有1999年学术出版社。

相似文献

1
Social Norms and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: The Effects of Context and Feedback.社会困境中的社会规范与合作:情境与反馈的影响
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999 May;78(2):81-103. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2825.
2
Cultural Values in Intergroup and Single-Group Social Dilemmas.群体间和单群体社会困境中的文化价值观
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999 Mar;77(3):171-191. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2822.
3
Why cooperate? An economic perspective is not enough.为什么要合作?仅从经济角度考量是不够的。
Behav Processes. 2004 Jun 30;66(3):261-77. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2004.03.008.
4
Suckers or saviors? Consistent contributors in social dilemmas.剥削者还是拯救者?社会困境中的持续贡献者。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Dec;95(6):1340-53. doi: 10.1037/a0012454.
5
Increasing Cooperation in Prisoner's Dilemmas by Establishing a Precedent of Efficiency in Coordination Games.通过在协调博弈中建立效率先例来增强囚徒困境中的合作。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2000 Jul;82(2):194-216. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2882.
6
Dynamic influences on cooperation in a social dilemma: How type of experience and communication affect behavioral spillovers.动态因素对社会困境中合作的影响:经验类型和沟通如何影响行为溢出。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 12;14(3):e0213038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213038. eCollection 2019.
7
When sanctions fail to increase cooperation in social dilemmas: considering the presence of an alternative option to defect.当制裁无法在社会困境中增进合作时:考虑存在背叛的替代选项的情况。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Oct;32(10):1312-24. doi: 10.1177/0146167206289978.
8
Tacit coordination in social dilemmas: the importance of having a common understanding.社会困境中的默契协调:达成共同理解的重要性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Mar;96(3):665-78. doi: 10.1037/a0012976.
9
A Social Categorization Explanation for Framing Effects in Nested Social Dilemmas.
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999 Aug;79(2):154-178. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2842.
10
Friend or foe: the effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making.敌友之间:社会决策中内隐可信度判断的影响
Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):796-803. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.002. Epub 2008 Aug 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Ripples in the pond: Evidence for contagious cooperative role modeling through moral elevation and calling in a small pre-study.池塘中的涟漪:在一项小型预研究中通过道德提升和感召实现传染性合作角色示范的证据
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 20;13:1005772. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1005772. eCollection 2022.
2
Perceived financial constraints and normative influence: discretionary purchase decisions across cultures.感知到的财务限制与规范影响:跨文化的 discretionary 购买决策 。 注:“discretionary”在这里不太明确准确含义,可能是“ discretionary purchase decisions”整体译为“自主购买决策”之类的更合适,但按要求未添加解释,直接按字面翻译了。
J Acad Mark Sci. 2022;50(2):252-271. doi: 10.1007/s11747-021-00814-x. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
3
Consumption Trends During the COVID-19 Crisis: How Awe, Coping, and Social Norms Drive Utilitarian Purchases.
新冠疫情危机期间的消费趋势:敬畏、应对方式及社会规范如何驱动功利性购买行为
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 19;11:588580. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588580. eCollection 2020.
4
Evolution of social norms and correlated equilibria.社会规范的演变和相关的均衡。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 30;116(18):8834-8839. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1817095116. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
5
Equity, Equal Shares or Equal Final Outcomes? Group Goal Guides Allocations of Public Goods.公平、平等份额还是平等的最终结果?群体目标指导公共物品的分配。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 25;8:36. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00036. eCollection 2017.
6
Do good actions inspire good actions in others?善举会激发他人的善举吗?
Sci Rep. 2014 Dec 12;4:7470. doi: 10.1038/srep07470.