Rabasa-Lhoret R, Garon J, Langelier H, Poisson D, Chiasson J L
Research Center, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Ontario, Canada.
Diabetes Care. 1999 May;22(5):667-73. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.5.667.
In this study, we evaluated the effects of high-(55%) and low-(40%) carbohydrate diets on insulin requirements in nine type 1 diabetic subjects treated intensively with ultralente as basal insulin and regular insulin as premeal insulin adjusted to the carbohydrate content of meals.
Nine subjects were randomized in a crossover design to follow two diets consecutively for a period of 14 days each. A 3-day food diary was completed for each diet with the amount of carbohydrate in the mixed meals ranging from 21 to 188 g. Preprandial (5.9 vs. 6.1 mmol/l) and postprandial (8 vs. 8.9 mmol/l) capillary glucose and fructosamine (310 vs. 316 mumol/l) were comparable on both the low- and high-carbohydrate diets.
The assessment of meal carbohydrate content by the patients was excellent, with > 85% of cases falling within 15% of computer-assisted evaluation. When premeal regular insulin was prescribed in U/10 g of carbohydrate, the postprandial glycemic rise remained constant (2.4 +/- 2.8 mmol/l) over a wide range of carbohydrate ingested (21-188 g) and was not affected by the glycemic index, fiber, and caloric and lipidic content of the meals. This tight control was maintained during the low- and high-carbohydrate diet without any change in insulin requirements (breakfast, 1.5 vs. 1.5 U/10 g of carbohydrate; lunch, 1.0 vs. 1.0; supper, 1.1 vs. 1.2) and in basal ultralente insulin requirements (22.5 vs. 21.4 U/day).
These results indicate that in type 1 diabetic subjects 1) increasing the amount of carbohydrate intake does not influence glycemic control if premeal regular insulin is adjusted to the carbohydrate content of the meals; 2) algorithms based on U/10 g of carbohydrate are effective and safe, whatever the amount of carbohydrate in the meal; 3) the glycemic index, fiber, and lipidic and caloric content of the meals do not affect premeal regular insulin requirements; 4) wide variations in carbohydrate intake do not modify basal (ultralente) insulin requirements; and, finally 5) the ultralente-regular insulin regimen allows dissection between basal and prandial insulin requirements, so that each can be adjusted accurately and independently.
在本研究中,我们评估了高碳水化合物(55%)和低碳水化合物(40%)饮食对9名1型糖尿病患者胰岛素需求量的影响。这些患者接受强化治疗,以超长效胰岛素作为基础胰岛素,普通胰岛素作为餐时胰岛素,并根据餐食的碳水化合物含量进行调整。
9名受试者采用交叉设计,依次遵循两种饮食,每种饮食持续14天。每种饮食均完成一份为期3天的食物日记,混合餐中的碳水化合物含量在21至188克之间。低碳水化合物饮食和高碳水化合物饮食的餐前(5.9对6.1毫摩尔/升)和餐后(8对8.9毫摩尔/升)毛细血管血糖及果糖胺(310对316微摩尔/升)具有可比性。
患者对餐食碳水化合物含量的评估非常出色,超过85%的情况落在计算机辅助评估值的15%范围内。当以每10克碳水化合物单位规定餐时普通胰岛素剂量时,在广泛的碳水化合物摄入量(21 - 188克)范围内,餐后血糖升高保持恒定(2.4±2.8毫摩尔/升),且不受餐食血糖指数、纤维以及热量和脂质含量的影响。在低碳水化合物饮食和高碳水化合物饮食期间,这种严格控制得以维持,胰岛素需求量没有任何变化(早餐,每10克碳水化合物1.5对1.5单位;午餐,1.0对1.0;晚餐,1.1对1.2),基础超长效胰岛素需求量也没有变化(22.5对21.4单位/天)。
这些结果表明,对于1型糖尿病患者,1)如果餐时普通胰岛素根据餐食的碳水化合物含量进行调整,增加碳水化合物摄入量不会影响血糖控制;2)基于每10克碳水化合物单位的算法无论餐食中碳水化合物含量多少都是有效且安全的;3)餐食的血糖指数、纤维以及脂质和热量含量不会影响餐时普通胰岛素需求量;4)碳水化合物摄入量的广泛变化不会改变基础(超长效)胰岛素需求量;最后,5)超长效胰岛素 - 普通胰岛素治疗方案能够区分基础胰岛素和餐时胰岛素需求量,从而可以分别进行准确且独立的调整。