Emoto M, Nishizawa Y, Maekawa K, Hiura Y, Kanda H, Kawagishi T, Shoji T, Okuno Y, Morii H
Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka City University Medical School, Japan.
Diabetes Care. 1999 May;22(5):818-22. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.5.818.
To investigate whether the insulin resistance index (IR) assessed by homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) is associated with the insulin resistance index assessed by euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp (clamp IR) in type 2 diabetic patients who received sulfonylureas (SUs), as well as in those treated by diet alone.
Retrospectively, the association between HOMA IR and clamp IR was analyzed in 80 type 2 diabetic subjects (53 subjects treated with SUs and 27 subjects treated with diet alone). The 80 subjects, selected because they had not received insulin therapy, were among 111 diabetic participants in a clamp study for evaluation of insulin resistance from May 1993 to December 1997 in Osaka City University Hospital.
The HOMA IR showed a hyperbolic relationship with clamp IR. The log-transformed HOMA IR (all subjects, r = -0.725, P < 0.0001; SU group, r = -0.727, P < 0.0001; diet group, r = -0.747, P < 0.0001) correlated more strongly with clamp IR than did HOMA IR per se (all subjects, r = -0.594, P < 0.0001; SU group, r = -0.640, P < 0.0001; diet group, r = -0.632, P = 0.0004). The univariate regression line between log-transformed HOMA IR and clamp IR in the SU group did not differ from that in the diet group (slope, -6.866 vs. -5.120, P > 0.05; intercept, 6.566 vs. 5.478, P > 0.05). Stepwise multiple regression analyses demonstrated that the log-transformed HOMA IR was the strongest independent contributor to clamp IR (R2 = 0.640, P < 0.0001).
The HOMA IR strongly correlated with the clamp IR in type 2 diabetic patients treated with SUs as well as in those treated with diet alone.
探讨在接受磺脲类药物(SUs)治疗的2型糖尿病患者以及仅接受饮食治疗的患者中,采用稳态模型评估(HOMA)法评估的胰岛素抵抗指数(IR)与采用正常血糖高胰岛素钳夹技术(钳夹IR)评估的胰岛素抵抗指数之间是否存在关联。
回顾性分析80例2型糖尿病患者(53例接受SUs治疗,27例仅接受饮食治疗)的HOMA IR与钳夹IR之间的关联。这80例患者因未接受胰岛素治疗而被选中,他们是1993年5月至1997年12月在大阪市立大学医院进行的一项用于评估胰岛素抵抗的钳夹研究中的111例糖尿病参与者。
HOMA IR与钳夹IR呈双曲线关系。经对数转换的HOMA IR(所有受试者,r = -0.725,P < 0.0001;SUs组,r = -0.727,P < 0.0001;饮食组,r = -0.747,P < 0.0001)与钳夹IR的相关性比HOMA IR本身更强(所有受试者,r = -0.594,P < 0.0001;SUs组,r = -0.640,P < 0.0001;饮食组,r = -0.632,P = 0.0004)。SUs组中经对数转换的HOMA IR与钳夹IR之间的单变量回归线与饮食组的无差异(斜率,-6.866对-5.120,P > 0.05;截距,6.566对5.478,P > 0.05)。逐步多元回归分析表明,经对数转换的HOMA IR是钳夹IR的最强独立影响因素(R2 = 0.640,P < 0.0001)。
在接受SUs治疗的2型糖尿病患者以及仅接受饮食治疗的患者中,HOMA IR与钳夹IR密切相关。