• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

稳态模型评估和定量胰岛素敏感性检查指数均无法预测老年2型糖尿病控制不佳患者的胰岛素抵抗。

Neither homeostasis model assessment nor quantitative insulin sensitivity check index can predict insulin resistance in elderly patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus.

作者信息

Katsuki Akira, Sumida Yasuhiro, Urakawa Hideki, Gabazza Esteban C, Murashima Shuichi, Morioka Kohei, Kitagawa Nagako, Tanaka Takashi, Araki-Sasaki Rika, Hori Yasuko, Nakatani Kaname, Yano Yutaka, Adachi Yukihiko

机构信息

Third Department of Internal Medicine, Mie University School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, 514-8507 Mie, Japan.

出版信息

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002 Nov;87(11):5332-5. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-020486.

DOI:10.1210/jc.2002-020486
PMID:12414910
Abstract

To clarify whether homeostasis model assessment (HOMA IR) and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) may be indicators of insulin resistance in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, their relationship with the glucose infusion rate during the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp study (clamp IR) was assessed. This study comprised 56 Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus; of these, 28 were 70 yr of age or older (group 1) and 28 were less than 70 yr of age (group 2). Their blood sugars were in poor control (fasting plasma glucose levels: group 1, 9.0 +/- 2.6 mmol/liter; group 2, 8.9 +/- 2.3 mmol/liter; hemoglobin A1c: group 1, 9.5 +/- 2.0%; group 2, 9.2 +/- 1.7%). Log-transformed HOMA IR was significantly correlated with the clamp IR in group 2 patients (r = -0.51, P < 0.01), but not in group 1 patients (r = -0.28, P = 0.15). There was a significant positive correlation between QUICKI and clamp IR in group 2 patients (r = 0.50, P < 0.01). However, no significant correlation was observed between QUICKI and clamp IR in group 1 patients (r = 0.31, P = 0.12). There was a significant correlation between log-transformed HOMA IR (r = -0.37, P < 0.01) or QUICKI (r = 0.37, P < 0.01) and clamp IR when both groups were combined. In conclusion, neither HOMA IR nor QUICKI should be used as an index of insulin resistance in elderly patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. The results of this study suggest the need for developing a new noninvasive method for evaluating insulin resistance in those patients.

摘要

为了明确稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)和定量胰岛素敏感性检查指数(QUICKI)是否可作为老年2型糖尿病患者胰岛素抵抗的指标,研究人员评估了它们与正常血糖高胰岛素钳夹研究期间(钳夹IR)葡萄糖输注率之间的关系。本研究纳入了56例日本2型糖尿病患者;其中,28例年龄在70岁及以上(第1组),28例年龄小于70岁(第2组)。他们的血糖控制不佳(空腹血糖水平:第1组,9.0±2.6 mmol/升;第2组,8.9±2.3 mmol/升;糖化血红蛋白:第1组,9.5±2.0%;第2组,9.2±1.7%)。第2组患者中,对数转换后的HOMA-IR与钳夹IR显著相关(r = -0.51,P < 0.01),但第1组患者中无显著相关性(r = -0.28,P = 0.15)。第2组患者中,QUICKI与钳夹IR呈显著正相关(r = 0.50,P < 0.01)。然而,第1组患者中QUICKI与钳夹IR之间未观察到显著相关性(r = 0.31,P = 0.12)。两组合并时,对数转换后的HOMA-IR(r = -0.37,P < 0.01)或QUICKI(r = 0.37,P < 0.01)与钳夹IR存在显著相关性。总之,对于血糖控制不佳的老年2型糖尿病患者,HOMA-IR和QUICKI均不应作为胰岛素抵抗的指标。本研究结果表明,需要开发一种新的非侵入性方法来评估这些患者的胰岛素抵抗。

相似文献

1
Neither homeostasis model assessment nor quantitative insulin sensitivity check index can predict insulin resistance in elderly patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus.稳态模型评估和定量胰岛素敏感性检查指数均无法预测老年2型糖尿病控制不佳患者的胰岛素抵抗。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002 Nov;87(11):5332-5. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-020486.
2
Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index and the reciprocal index of homeostasis model assessment are useful indexes of insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients with wide range of fasting plasma glucose.定量胰岛素敏感性检查指数和稳态模型评估的倒数指数是空腹血糖范围较宽的2型糖尿病患者胰岛素抵抗的有用指标。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Mar;89(3):1481-4. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-031374.
3
Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index and the reciprocal index of homeostasis model assessment in normal range weight and moderately obese type 2 diabetic patients.正常体重和中度肥胖2型糖尿病患者的定量胰岛素敏感性检查指数及稳态模型评估倒数指数
Diabetes Care. 2003 Aug;26(8):2426-32. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.8.2426.
4
Homeostasis model assessment is a reliable indicator of insulin resistance during follow-up of patients with type 2 diabetes.稳态模型评估是2型糖尿病患者随访期间胰岛素抵抗的可靠指标。
Diabetes Care. 2001 Feb;24(2):362-5. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.2.362.
5
Homeostasis model assessment as a clinical index of insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients treated with sulfonylureas.稳态模型评估作为接受磺脲类药物治疗的2型糖尿病患者胰岛素抵抗的临床指标。
Diabetes Care. 1999 May;22(5):818-22. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.5.818.
6
Relation between HOMA-IR and insulin sensitivity index determined by hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp analysis during treatment with a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂治疗期间,通过高胰岛素-正葡萄糖钳夹分析测定的 HOMA-IR 与胰岛素敏感指数之间的关系。
Endocr J. 2020 May 28;67(5):501-507. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ19-0445. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
7
Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance for evaluating insulin sensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy.用于评估胰岛素治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者胰岛素敏感性的胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估。
Endocr J. 2013;60(3):283-90. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.ej12-0320. Epub 2012 Nov 10.
8
Modified quantitative insulin sensitivity check index is better correlated to hyperinsulinemic glucose clamp than other fasting-based index of insulin sensitivity in different insulin-resistant states.在不同胰岛素抵抗状态下,改良的定量胰岛素敏感性检查指数比其他基于空腹的胰岛素敏感性指数与高胰岛素血症葡萄糖钳夹试验的相关性更好。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Oct;88(10):4917-23. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-030316.
9
Validity and reproducibility of HOMA-IR, 1/HOMA-IR, QUICKI and McAuley's indices in patients with hypertension and type II diabetes.高血压合并2型糖尿病患者中HOMA-IR、1/HOMA-IR、QUICKI及麦考利指数的有效性和可重复性
J Hum Hypertens. 2007 Sep;21(9):709-16. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1002201. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
10
Limitation of the validity of the homeostasis model assessment as an index of insulin resistance in Korea.韩国稳态模型评估作为胰岛素抵抗指标的有效性局限性。
Metabolism. 2005 Feb;54(2):206-11. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2004.08.014.

引用本文的文献

1
The prognostic value of the triglyceride-glucose index in predicting recurrence of acute pancreatitis: a retrospective cohort study.甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数在预测急性胰腺炎复发中的预后价值:一项回顾性队列研究。
Nutr Metab (Lond). 2025 Jun 5;22(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12986-025-00956-7.
2
Hepatic and metabolic outcomes induced by sub-chronic exposure to polystyrene microplastics in mice.亚慢性暴露于聚苯乙烯微塑料对小鼠肝脏和代谢的影响。
Arch Toxicol. 2024 Nov;98(11):3811-3823. doi: 10.1007/s00204-024-03847-7. Epub 2024 Aug 25.
3
Insulin resistance, kidney outcomes and effects of the endothelin receptor antagonist atrasentan in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease.
胰岛素抵抗、肾脏结局和内皮素受体拮抗剂阿曲生坦在 2 型糖尿病和慢性肾脏病患者中的作用。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023 Sep 16;22(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-01964-8.
4
Predictive values of metabolic score for insulin resistance on risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and comparison with other insulin resistance indices among Chinese with and without diabetes mellitus: Results from the 4C cohort study.代谢评分预测胰岛素抵抗与中国糖尿病和非糖尿病患者主要不良心血管事件风险的关系:4C 队列研究结果。
J Diabetes Investig. 2023 Aug;14(8):961-972. doi: 10.1111/jdi.14024. Epub 2023 May 2.
5
The Use and Effectiveness of Selected Alternative Markers for Insulin Sensitivity and Secretion Compared with Gold Standard Markers in Dietary Intervention Studies in Individuals without Diabetes: Results of a Systematic Review.在非糖尿病个体的饮食干预研究中,与金标准标志物相比,选择的替代胰岛素敏感性和分泌标志物的使用和有效性:系统评价结果。
Nutrients. 2022 May 12;14(10):2036. doi: 10.3390/nu14102036.
6
Isolated systolic hypertension and insulin resistance assessment tools in young and middle-aged Chinese men with normal fasting glucose: a cross-sectional study.孤立性收缩期高血压和胰岛素抵抗评估工具在空腹血糖正常的中国年轻和中年男性中的应用:一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 14;12(1):758. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04763-x.
7
Oral Limonite Supplement Ameliorates Glucose Intolerance in Diabetic and Obese Mice.口服褐铁矿补充剂可改善糖尿病和肥胖小鼠的葡萄糖耐量。
J Inflamm Res. 2021 Jul 9;14:3089-3105. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S320451. eCollection 2021.
8
Population insulin sensitivity from sparsely sampled oral glucose tolerance tests.从稀疏采样的口服葡萄糖耐量试验中评估人群胰岛素敏感性。
Metabolism. 2020 Sep;110:154298. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154298. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
9
Relationship between markers of insulin resistance, markers of adiposity, HbA1c, and cognitive functions in a middle-aged population-based sample: the MONA LISA study.在一个基于中年人群的样本中,胰岛素抵抗标志物、肥胖标志物、HbA1c 与认知功能之间的关系:MONA LISA 研究。
Diabetes Care. 2013 Jun;36(6):1512-21. doi: 10.2337/dc12-1017. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
10
Selection of the appropriate method for the assessment of insulin resistance.胰岛素抵抗评估方法的选择。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Nov 23;11:158. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-158.