Katsuki Akira, Sumida Yasuhiro, Urakawa Hideki, Gabazza Esteban C, Murashima Shuichi, Morioka Kohei, Kitagawa Nagako, Tanaka Takashi, Araki-Sasaki Rika, Hori Yasuko, Nakatani Kaname, Yano Yutaka, Adachi Yukihiko
Third Department of Internal Medicine, Mie University School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, 514-8507 Mie, Japan.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002 Nov;87(11):5332-5. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-020486.
To clarify whether homeostasis model assessment (HOMA IR) and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) may be indicators of insulin resistance in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, their relationship with the glucose infusion rate during the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp study (clamp IR) was assessed. This study comprised 56 Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus; of these, 28 were 70 yr of age or older (group 1) and 28 were less than 70 yr of age (group 2). Their blood sugars were in poor control (fasting plasma glucose levels: group 1, 9.0 +/- 2.6 mmol/liter; group 2, 8.9 +/- 2.3 mmol/liter; hemoglobin A1c: group 1, 9.5 +/- 2.0%; group 2, 9.2 +/- 1.7%). Log-transformed HOMA IR was significantly correlated with the clamp IR in group 2 patients (r = -0.51, P < 0.01), but not in group 1 patients (r = -0.28, P = 0.15). There was a significant positive correlation between QUICKI and clamp IR in group 2 patients (r = 0.50, P < 0.01). However, no significant correlation was observed between QUICKI and clamp IR in group 1 patients (r = 0.31, P = 0.12). There was a significant correlation between log-transformed HOMA IR (r = -0.37, P < 0.01) or QUICKI (r = 0.37, P < 0.01) and clamp IR when both groups were combined. In conclusion, neither HOMA IR nor QUICKI should be used as an index of insulin resistance in elderly patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. The results of this study suggest the need for developing a new noninvasive method for evaluating insulin resistance in those patients.
为了明确稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)和定量胰岛素敏感性检查指数(QUICKI)是否可作为老年2型糖尿病患者胰岛素抵抗的指标,研究人员评估了它们与正常血糖高胰岛素钳夹研究期间(钳夹IR)葡萄糖输注率之间的关系。本研究纳入了56例日本2型糖尿病患者;其中,28例年龄在70岁及以上(第1组),28例年龄小于70岁(第2组)。他们的血糖控制不佳(空腹血糖水平:第1组,9.0±2.6 mmol/升;第2组,8.9±2.3 mmol/升;糖化血红蛋白:第1组,9.5±2.0%;第2组,9.2±1.7%)。第2组患者中,对数转换后的HOMA-IR与钳夹IR显著相关(r = -0.51,P < 0.01),但第1组患者中无显著相关性(r = -0.28,P = 0.15)。第2组患者中,QUICKI与钳夹IR呈显著正相关(r = 0.50,P < 0.01)。然而,第1组患者中QUICKI与钳夹IR之间未观察到显著相关性(r = 0.31,P = 0.12)。两组合并时,对数转换后的HOMA-IR(r = -0.37,P < 0.01)或QUICKI(r = 0.37,P < 0.01)与钳夹IR存在显著相关性。总之,对于血糖控制不佳的老年2型糖尿病患者,HOMA-IR和QUICKI均不应作为胰岛素抵抗的指标。本研究结果表明,需要开发一种新的非侵入性方法来评估这些患者的胰岛素抵抗。