Mann W C, Ottenbacher K J, Fraas L, Tomita M, Granger C V
Engineering Research Center on Aging, University at Buffalo, NY, USA.
Arch Fam Med. 1999 May-Jun;8(3):210-7. doi: 10.1001/archfami.8.3.210.
Home environmental interventions (EIs) and assistive technology (AT) devices have the potential to increase independence for community-based frail elderly persons, but their effectiveness has not been demonstrated.
To evaluate a system of AT-EI service provision designed to promote independence and reduce health care costs for physically frail elderly persons.
Randomized controlled trial.
A total of 104 home-based frail elderly persons living in western New York were assigned to 1 of 2 groups (52 treatment, 52 control).
All participants underwent a comprehensive functional assessment and evaluation of their home environment. Participants in the treatment group received AT and EIs based on the results of the evaluation. The control group received "usual care services."
Functional status as measured by the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique; pain as measured by the Functional Status Instrument; and health care costs including the costs.
After the 18-month intervention period, the treatment groups showed significant decline for FIM total score and FIM motor score, but there was significantly more decline for the control group. Functional Status Instrument pain scores increased significantly more for the control group. In a comparison of health care costs, the treatment group expended more than the control group for AT and EIs. The control group required significantly more expenditures for institutional care. There was no significant difference in total in-home personnel costs, although there was a large effect size. The control group had significantly greater expenditures for nurse visits and case manager visits.
The frail elderly persons in this trial experienced functional decline over time. Results indicate rate of decline can be slowed, and institutional and certain in-home personnel costs reduced through a systematic approach to providing AT and EIs.
家庭环境干预(EI)和辅助技术(AT)设备有可能提高社区体弱老年人的独立性,但其有效性尚未得到证实。
评估一个旨在促进身体虚弱老年人的独立性并降低医疗保健成本的AT-EI服务提供系统。
随机对照试验。
共有104名居住在纽约西部的居家体弱老年人被分配到2组中的1组(52名治疗组,52名对照组)。
所有参与者都接受了全面的功能评估和家庭环境评估。治疗组的参与者根据评估结果接受了AT和EI。对照组接受“常规护理服务”。
通过功能独立性测量(FIM)和克雷格残疾评估与报告技术测量的功能状态;通过功能状态量表测量的疼痛;以及包括成本在内的医疗保健成本。
在18个月的干预期后,治疗组的FIM总分和FIM运动评分显著下降,但对照组下降得更显著。对照组的功能状态量表疼痛评分增加得更显著。在医疗保健成本比较中,治疗组在AT和EI方面的支出超过对照组。对照组在机构护理方面的支出显著更多。家庭内总人员成本没有显著差异,尽管效应量很大。对照组在护士访视和病例管理访视方面的支出显著更多。
该试验中的体弱老年人随着时间推移出现功能衰退。结果表明,通过系统地提供AT和EI,可以减缓衰退速度,并降低机构和某些家庭内人员成本。