Joo Baeho, L Marquez Jodie, Osmotherly Peter G
School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, University Dr, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 7;10(18):e37649. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37649. eCollection 2024 Sep 30.
The primary management strategy for gait impairment is the adoption of a walking aid. However, there are no established criteria upon which to base a decision regarding the need for a walking aid. It appears clinicians prescribe aids based on preference, clinical experience and intuition rather than standardised objective rationale. This may contribute to the inconsistent gait response to walking aids reported in the published literature. Understanding gait changes resulting from gait aid usage may have significant impact on clinical practice by improving confidence of prescribing clinicians and compliance of walking aid usage by patients, maximising the benefits of use, and reducing any risks associated with non-use or inappropriate use, of the walking aid.
Do professionally prescribed walking aids improve gait parameters?
This is a secondary data analysis of a cross-sectional study where participants, identified by healthcare staff requiring a mobility assessment due to potential balance impairment of any cause, walked a 20-m straight walking course under three different walking conditions (no aid, walking stick and 4-wheeled walker). Fifty-eight participants were recruited. Commonly reported spatial and temporal gait parameters were assessed using a validated gait analysis device. Changes in gait parameters across the three conditions were compared, noting the individual's professionally prescribed aid and interpreting changes in parameters towards outcomes of the 'no aid required group'.
Gait cycle, cadence, stance, swing and stride length during unaided walking were significantly changed when a walking stick was prescribed (p < 0.05). Stance, swing, double support, stride length, speed, max toe clearance and minimum toe clearance were significantly changed when a 4-wheel walker was prescribed (p < 0.05). Professional walking aid prescription improves some gait parameters. A greater number and magnitude of gait parameter improvements were seen in people requiring a 4-wheel walker than people requiring a walking stick.
步态障碍的主要管理策略是使用助行器。然而,对于是否需要使用助行器,尚无既定的决策标准。临床医生似乎是根据个人偏好、临床经验和直觉来开具助行器处方,而非基于标准化的客观依据。这可能导致已发表文献中报道的使用助行器后步态反应不一致。了解使用助行器导致的步态变化,可能会对临床实践产生重大影响,提高开具处方的临床医生的信心以及患者使用助行器的依从性,使使用助行器的益处最大化,并降低与不使用或不当使用助行器相关的任何风险。
专业开具处方的助行器是否能改善步态参数?
这是一项横断面研究的二次数据分析,参与者由医护人员确定,因任何原因导致的潜在平衡障碍而需要进行运动能力评估,他们在三种不同的行走条件下(不使用辅助器具、使用手杖和使用四轮助行器)走完一条20米的直线行走路线。招募了58名参与者。使用经过验证的步态分析设备评估常见的空间和时间步态参数。比较三种条件下步态参数的变化,记录个人专业开具处方的辅助器具,并将参数变化解释为“无需辅助器具组”的结果。
开具手杖处方时,无辅助行走时的步态周期、步频、支撑期、摆动期和步长有显著变化(p<0.05)。开具四轮助行器处方时,支撑期、摆动期、双支撑期、步长、速度、最大足趾间隙和最小足趾间隙有显著变化(p<0.05)。专业的助行器处方可改善一些步态参数。与需要手杖的人相比,需要四轮助行器的人在步态参数改善的数量和幅度上更大。