Hérick de Sá Thiago, Sudsataya Daniele, Fry Andra, Salehi Nazak, Katiki Aishwarya, Mcleod Megan, Rathmell Greg, Cylus Jon, Lafortune Louise, Buffel Tine, Doran Patty, Officer Alana, Naci Huseyin
Demographic Change and Healthy Ageing Unit, Department for Social Determinants of Health, World Health Organization, Switzerland.
Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK.
J Transp Health. 2024 Sep;38:101859. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2024.101859.
Age-friendly cities and communities aim to enhance and preserve the functional abilities of older adults. This systematic review assesses the impact of interventions in transportation, housing, and urban development on the mobility of older adults.
We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO, and SocINDEX up to July 2022 to identify studies that evaluated the impact of transportation, housing, and urban development interventions on older adults' mobility. Only randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies with control groups were included to establish a causal relationship between interventions and mobility outcomes.
We included a total of 15 studies, of which six were randomised controlled trials. Included studies were conducted in high-income settings and employed diverse metrics to assess mobility outcomes. Among housing interventions, three studies examined the impact of assistive technology within home environments for frail older adults. Two of these interventions maintained functional status without improvement, while the third showed a significant decline in outcomes, with the control group faring even worse. Public transport interventions, focused on enhancing mobility through educational initiatives and policy revisions, consistently produced positive outcomes. Interventions related to driving training for older adults, including in-class and on-road assessments, demonstrated beneficial effects. Results from studies evaluating urban design interventions were more varied, with some enhancing mobility by making public spaces more accessible for older adults and others yielding mixed results following infrastructure changes.
Interventions in the built environments of older adults, specifically targeting transportation, housing and urban development, have the potential to enhance mobility and related outcomes according to rigorously designed quantitative evaluations. Due to heterogeneity in how mobility is conceptualised in the literature, greater harmonisation in measurement of mobility would help us understand how the social and built environment contribute to maintaining and improving mobility in older adults.
World Health Organization.
老龄化友好型城市和社区旨在增强和保持老年人的功能能力。本系统评价评估了交通、住房和城市发展方面的干预措施对老年人出行能力的影响。
我们系统检索了截至2022年7月的MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、Scopus、PsycINFO和SocINDEX数据库,以识别评估交通、住房和城市发展干预措施对老年人出行能力影响的研究。仅纳入随机对照试验和有对照组的准实验研究,以确定干预措施与出行结果之间的因果关系。
我们共纳入15项研究,其中6项为随机对照试验。纳入的研究在高收入环境中进行,并采用了多种指标来评估出行结果。在住房干预措施中,有3项研究考察了家庭环境中辅助技术对体弱老年人的影响。其中两项干预措施维持了功能状态但没有改善,而第三项显示结果显著下降,对照组情况更糟。公共交通干预措施侧重于通过教育举措和政策修订来提高出行能力,始终产生积极效果。与老年人驾驶培训相关的干预措施,包括课堂和道路评估,显示出有益效果。评估城市设计干预措施的研究结果差异更大,一些通过使公共空间对老年人更易进入来提高出行能力,而另一些在基础设施改变后产生了混合结果。
根据严格设计的定量评估,针对老年人建筑环境的干预措施,特别是针对交通、住房和城市发展的干预措施,有可能提高出行能力和相关结果。由于文献中对出行能力的概念化方式存在异质性,出行能力测量方面更大程度的统一将有助于我们理解社会和建筑环境如何有助于维持和改善老年人的出行能力。
世界卫生组织