Wood J M, Nezworski M T, Stejskal W J, Garven S, West S G
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at El Paso, 79968, USA.
Assessment. 1999 Jun;6(2):115-29. doi: 10.1177/107319119900600202.
The old controversy regarding the Rorschach Inkblot Test has recently revived. The present article suggests that the debate will be most productive if careful attention is paid to methodological issues. Three recent examples illustrate how incorrect conclusions regarding Rorschach validity may occur if methodological issues are not evaluated carefully. The present article examines (a) Burns and Viglione s (1996) conclusion that the Rorschach Human Experience Variable (HEV) is a predictor of interpersonal relatedness among adults; (b) Weiner s (1996) conclusion that the D score and Morbid Responses (MOR) are valid measures of experienced distress in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD); and (c) Ganellen s (1996a, 1996b) conclusion that the Rorschach Depression Index (DEPI) and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) are comparable in their power to identify diagnoses of depression.
关于罗夏墨迹测验的旧有争议近来再度兴起。本文指出，如果能仔细关注方法学问题，这场辩论将最具成效。最近的三个例子说明了若不仔细评估方法学问题，关于罗夏测验效度可能会得出怎样错误的结论。本文审视了：(a) 伯恩斯和维廖内（1996年）关于罗夏人类经验变量（HEV）是成年人人际亲密度预测指标的结论；(b) 韦纳（1996年）关于D分数和病态反应（MOR）是创伤后应激障碍（PTSD）中经历痛苦的有效测量指标的结论；以及(c) 加内伦（1996年a，1996年b）关于罗夏抑郁指数（DEPI）和明尼苏达多相人格调查表（MMPI）在识别抑郁症诊断能力方面具有可比性的结论。
