Des Jarlais D C, Paone D, Milliken J, Turner C F, Miller H, Gribble J, Shi Q, Hagan H, Friedman S R
Beth Israel Medical Center, Chemical Dependency Institute, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Lancet. 1999 May 15;353(9165):1657-61. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)07026-3.
We aimed to assess audio-computer-assisted self-interviewing (audio-CASI) as a method of reducing under-reporting of HIV risk behaviour among injecting drug users.
Injecting drug users were interviewed at syringe-exchange programmes in four US cities. Potential respondents were randomly selected from participants in the syringe exchanges, with weekly alternate assignment to either traditional face-to-face interviews or audio-CASI. The questionnaire included items on sociodemographic characteristics, drug use, and HIV risk behaviours for 30 days preceding the interview. We calculated odds ratios for the difference in reporting of HIV risk behaviours between interview methods.
757 respondents were interviewed face-to-face, and 724 were interviewed by audio-CASI. More respondents reported HIV risk behaviours and other sensitive behaviours in audio-CASI than in face-to-face interviews (odds ratios for reporting of rented or bought used injection equipment in audio-CASI vs face-to-face interview 2.1 [95% CI 1.4-3.3] p=0.001; for injection with borrowed used injection equipment 1.5 [1.1-2.2] p=0.02; for renting or selling used equipment 2.3 [1.3-4.0] p=0.003).
Although validation of these self-reported behaviours was not possible, we propose that audio-CASI enables substantially more complete reporting of HIV risk behaviour. More complete reporting might increase understanding of the dynamics of HIV transmission and make the assessment of HIV-prevention efforts easier.
我们旨在评估音频计算机辅助自我访谈(audio-CASI)作为一种减少注射吸毒者中艾滋病毒风险行为报告不足的方法。
在美国四个城市的注射器交换项目中对注射吸毒者进行访谈。潜在受访者从注射器交换参与者中随机选择,每周交替分配到传统面对面访谈或音频计算机辅助自我访谈。问卷包括社会人口学特征、吸毒情况以及访谈前30天的艾滋病毒风险行为等项目。我们计算了不同访谈方法在艾滋病毒风险行为报告差异方面的比值比。
757名受访者接受了面对面访谈,724名受访者接受了音频计算机辅助自我访谈。与面对面访谈相比,更多受访者在音频计算机辅助自我访谈中报告了艾滋病毒风险行为和其他敏感行为(音频计算机辅助自我访谈与面对面访谈相比,报告租用或购买用过的注射设备的比值比为2.1 [95%可信区间1.4 - 3.3],p = 0.001;借用用过的注射设备注射的比值比为1.5 [1.1 - 2.2],p = 0.02;租用或出售用过的设备的比值比为2.3 [1.3 - 4.0],p = 0.003)。
尽管无法对这些自我报告的行为进行验证,但我们认为音频计算机辅助自我访谈能够使艾滋病毒风险行为的报告更加完整。更完整的报告可能会增进对艾滋病毒传播动态的理解,并使评估艾滋病毒预防工作更加容易。