Morita T, Tsunoda J, Inoue S, Chihara S
Seirei Hospice, Seirei Mikatabara Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
Support Care Cancer. 1999 May;7(3):128-33. doi: 10.1007/s005200050242.
Although accurate prediction of survival is essential for palliative care, few clinical methods of determining how long a patient is likely to live have been established. To develop a validated scoring system for survival prediction, a retrospective cohort study was performed with a training-testing procedure on two independent series of terminally ill cancer patients. Performance status (PS) and clinical symptoms were assessed prospectively. In the training set (355 assessments on 150 patients) the Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI) was defined by PS, oral intake, edema, dyspnea at rest, and delirium. In the testing sample (233 assessments on 95 patients) the predictive values of this scoring system were examined. In the testing set, patients were classified into three groups: group A (PPI< or =2.0), group B (2.0<PPI< or =4.0), and group C (PPI>4.0). Group B survived significantly longer than group C, and group A survived significantly longer than either of the others. Also, when a PPI of more than 6 was adopted as a cut-off point, 3 weeks' survival was predicted with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 85%. When a PPI of more than 4 was used as a cutoff point, 6 weeks' survival was predicted with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 77%. In conclusion, whether patients live longer than 3 or 6 weeks can be acceptably predicted by PPI.
尽管准确预测生存期对于姑息治疗至关重要,但很少有已确立的临床方法来确定患者可能存活的时长。为了开发一个经过验证的生存期预测评分系统,我们对两组独立的晚期癌症患者系列进行了一项带有训练-测试程序的回顾性队列研究。前瞻性地评估了患者的体能状态(PS)和临床症状。在训练集(对150例患者进行了355次评估)中,姑息预后指数(PPI)由PS、经口摄入量、水肿、静息时呼吸困难和谵妄来定义。在测试样本(对95例患者进行了233次评估)中,检验了该评分系统的预测价值。在测试集中,患者被分为三组:A组(PPI≤2.0)、B组(2.0<PPI≤4.0)和C组(PPI>4.0)。B组的生存期显著长于C组,A组的生存期显著长于其他两组中的任何一组。此外,当采用PPI大于6作为截断点时,预测3周生存期的敏感度为80%,特异度为85%。当使用PPI大于4作为截断点时,预测6周生存期的敏感度为80%,特异度为77%。总之,PPI能够对患者是否能存活超过3周或6周进行可接受程度的预测。