Morita T, Tsunoda J, Inoue S, Chihara S
Seirei Hospice, Seirei Mikatabara Hospital, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1999 Mar;29(3):156-9. doi: 10.1093/jjco/29.3.156.
Although accurate prediction of survival is essential for palliative care, no clinical tools have been established.
Performance status and clinical symptoms were prospectively assessed on two independent series of terminally ill cancer patients (training set, n = 150; testing set, n = 95). On the training set, the cases were divided into two groups with or without a risk factor for shorter than 3 and 6 weeks survival, according to the way the classification achieved acceptable predictive value. The validity of this classification for survival prediction was examined on the test samples.
The cases with performance status 10 or 20, dyspnea at rest or delirium were classified in the group with a predicted survival of shorter than 3 weeks. The cases with performance status 10 or 20, edema, dyspnea at rest or delirium were classified in the group with a predicted survival of shorter than 6 weeks. On the training set, this classification predicted 3 and 6 weeks survival with sensitivity 75 and 76% and specificity 84 and 78%, respectively. On the test populations, whether patients survived for 3 and 6 weeks or not was predicted with sensitivity 85 and 79% and specificity 84 and 72%, respectively.
Whether or not patients live for 3 and 6 weeks can be acceptably predicted by this simple classification.
尽管准确预测生存期对于姑息治疗至关重要,但尚未建立临床工具。
对两组独立的晚期癌症患者(训练集,n = 150;测试集,n = 95)前瞻性评估其功能状态和临床症状。在训练集上,根据分类达到可接受预测价值的方式,将病例分为生存期短于3周和6周且有或无危险因素的两组。在测试样本上检验该分类对生存期预测的有效性。
功能状态为10或20、静息时呼吸困难或谵妄的病例被分类到预测生存期短于3周的组。功能状态为10或20、水肿、静息时呼吸困难或谵妄的病例被分类到预测生存期短于6周的组。在训练集上,该分类预测3周和6周生存期的敏感性分别为75%和76%,特异性分别为84%和78%。在测试人群中,预测患者是否存活3周和6周的敏感性分别为85%和79%,特异性分别为84%和72%。
通过这种简单分类可以对患者是否存活3周和6周进行可接受的预测。