• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Efficacy of sublingual verapamil in patients with severe essential hypertension: comparison with sublingual nifedipine.

作者信息

Al-Waili N S, Hasan N A

机构信息

Dubai Medical Center for Treatment and Research, P.O.Box 19964, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

出版信息

Eur J Med Res. 1999 May 26;4(5):193-8.

PMID:10336409
Abstract

Ninety patients, 50 males and 40 females, and their ages ranged between 42 and 70 years, with severe hypertension were treated by either sublingual verapamil tablets 40 mg (30 patients) or 80 mg (30 patients) or sublingual nifedipine capsules 10 mg (30 patients). Blood pressure and heart rate were measured before and 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 mins after administration of the drugs. - Results showed that sublingual verapamil 40 mg caused significant drop of blood pressure after 60 min (200 +/- 11.6 / 127 +/- 8.7 to 177 +/- 13.8 / 95.4 +/- 11.8, P <0.05) and in 10/30 patients blood pressure was less than 150/90 mmHg. Verapamil 40 mg decreased heart rate in 16 patients, elevated in 5 patients and unchanged heart rate in 9 patients. Verapamil 80 mg caused significant reduction of blood pressure after 30 min (201 +/- 16 / 129 +/- 7.5 to 182 +/- 13 / 105 +/- 10.7, P <0.05) and the blood pressure was dropped to less than 150/90 mmHg in 18/30 patients. Sublingual verapamil 80 mg caused significant decrease in heart rate in 21/30 patients and peak decrease was recorded at 90 min (92.6 +/- 7.2 beats/min to 82 +/- 9, P <0.05). It alleviated headache in 8 patients including 2 patients with migraine. Sublingual nifedipine caused significant drop of elevated blood pressure at each time intervals and the peak drop was at 60 min (from 199 +/- 13.8 / 126 +/- 13.2 to 142.8 +/- 15 / 80. 9 +/- 9, P <0.05). In 22/30 patients blood pressure dropped to less than 150/90 mmHg after 60 min. Nifedipine elevated heart rate in 22/30 patients and peak elevation was at 30 min (from 91.6 +/- 7.8 to 105.6 +/- 6.1 beats/min, P <0.05). It caused headache in 8 patients and flushing in other 2 patients. Therefore, as compared to sublingual verapamil, sublingual nifedipine caused rapid lowering of elevated blood pressure and elevation of heart rate in most of the patients treated. The differences in proportions of patients whom blood pressure was dropped to less than 150/90 mmHg between nifedipine group and verapamil 40 mg group and between verapamil 80 mg and verapamil 40 mg groups were significant (P <0.05). - It might be concluded that sublingual verapamil caused significant lowering of blood pressure in hypertensive patients, decreased heart rate in most of the treated patients and alleviated headache in symptomatic hypertensive patients.

摘要

相似文献

1
Efficacy of sublingual verapamil in patients with severe essential hypertension: comparison with sublingual nifedipine.
Eur J Med Res. 1999 May 26;4(5):193-8.
2
[Sublingually administered captopril versus nifedipine in hypertension emergencies].高血压急症中舌下含服卡托普利与硝苯地平的比较
Minerva Cardioangiol. 1990 Jan-Feb;38(1-2):37-44.
3
Treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension with calcium channel blockers: a multicentre comparison of once-daily nifedipine GITS with once-daily amlodipine.钙通道阻滞剂治疗轻至中度高血压:一日一次硝苯地平控释片与一日一次氨氯地平的多中心比较
Curr Med Res Opin. 2003;19(3):226-37. doi: 10.1185/030079903125001677.
4
[Sublingual captopril versus nifedipine in the treatment of hypertensive crisis].舌下含服卡托普利与硝苯地平治疗高血压急症的比较
Rev Med Chil. 1991 Apr;119(4):402-5.
5
Treatment of hypertensive emergencies with nifedipine.硝苯地平治疗高血压急症。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1988 Jul;26(7):351-5.
6
Nicardipine versus nifedipine: multicentre controlled trial in essential hypertension.尼卡地平与硝苯地平对比:原发性高血压的多中心对照试验。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1988;8(6):393-400.
7
Nifedipine and captopril exert divergent effects on heart rate variability in patients with acute episodes of hypertension.硝苯地平和卡托普利对高血压急性发作患者的心率变异性有不同影响。
J Hum Hypertens. 1996 May;10(5):327-32.
8
Antihypertensive therapy with the long-acting calcium antagonist nitrendipine.使用长效钙拮抗剂尼群地平进行抗高血压治疗。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1984;6 Suppl 7:S1073-6.
9
[Comparative evaluation of the hypotensive effects of finoptin and corinfar after their sublingual administration].[舌下含服非诺普汀和可立夫之后的降压效果比较评估]
Klin Med (Mosk). 1988 Feb;66(2):38-41.
10
[Comparison of the effects of diazepam, nifedipine, propranolol and a combination of nifedipine and propranolol, by sublingual administration, in patients with hypertensive crisis].[舌下含服地西泮、硝苯地平、普萘洛尔以及硝苯地平与普萘洛尔联合用药对高血压危象患者的疗效比较]
Arq Bras Cardiol. 1991 Oct;57(4):313-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacologic Treatment of Hypertensive Urgency in the Outpatient Setting: A Systematic Review.高血压急症门诊患者的药物治疗:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Apr;33(4):539-550. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4277-6. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
2
Challenges and Future Prospects for the Delivery of Biologics: Oral Mucosal, Pulmonary, and Transdermal Routes.生物制剂递送的挑战与未来前景:口腔黏膜、肺部和透皮途径
AAPS J. 2017 May;19(3):652-668. doi: 10.1208/s12248-017-0054-z. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
3
Oral drugs for hypertensive urgencies: systematic review and meta-analysis.
用于高血压急症的口服药物:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2009 Nov;127(6):366-72. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802009000600009.
4
Oral mucosal drug delivery: clinical pharmacokinetics and therapeutic applications.口腔黏膜给药:临床药代动力学与治疗应用。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2002;41(9):661-80. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200241090-00003.