Suppr超能文献

肺癌筛查与外科肿瘤学家:争议

Lung cancer screening and the surgical oncologist: the controversy.

作者信息

Strauss G M, Dominioni L

机构信息

Department of Adult Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 1999 Apr;8(2):371-87.

Abstract

Although screening for lung cancer is not currently recommended, randomized trials consistently demonstrate that chest x-ray screening is associated with significant advantages in stage distribution, resectability, and long-term survival. Because these advantages have not been accompanied by a reduction in lung cancer mortalities a because an excess number of lung cancers were detected in experimental populations in two studies, it has been suggested that screening leads to the detection of clinically unimportant lung cancers. This hypothesis, known as overdiagnosis, is the only obstacle to the conclusion that chest x-ray screening saves lives. However, abundant evidence convincingly demonstrates that the overdiagnosis hypothesis is myth with regard to chest x-ray screening for lung cancer. With more than one million deaths from lung cancer on a worldwide basis every year, public policy regarding screening for lung cancer is in urgent need of reconsideration.

摘要

尽管目前不推荐进行肺癌筛查,但随机试验一致表明,胸部X光筛查在分期分布、可切除性和长期生存方面具有显著优势。由于这些优势并未伴随着肺癌死亡率的降低,且在两项研究的实验人群中检测到过多的肺癌,因此有人认为筛查导致了临床上不重要的肺癌被检测出来。这一假说被称为过度诊断,是得出胸部X光筛查能挽救生命这一结论的唯一障碍。然而,大量证据令人信服地表明,就肺癌的胸部X光筛查而言,过度诊断假说是无稽之谈。每年全球有超过100万人死于肺癌,因此关于肺癌筛查的公共政策急需重新考虑。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验