• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

布里斯托尔共享护理青光眼研究:社区验光和医院眼科服务检测措施的可靠性

The Bristol Shared Care Glaucoma Study: reliability of community optometric and hospital eye service test measures.

作者信息

Spry P G, Spencer I C, Sparrow J M, Peters T J, Brookes S T, Gray S, Baker I, Furber J E, Easty D L

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bristol, Bristol.

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 1999 Jun;83(6):707-12. doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.6.707.

DOI:10.1136/bjo.83.6.707
PMID:10340981
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1723073/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Primary open angle glaucoma patients and glaucoma suspects make up a considerable proportion of outpatient ophthalmological attendances and require lifelong review. Community optometrists can be suitably trained for assessment of glaucoma. This randomised controlled trial aims to assess the ability of community optometrists in the monitoring of this group of patients.

METHODS

Measures of cup to disc ratio, visual field score, and intraocular pressure were taken by community optometrists, the hospital eye service and a research clinic reference "gold" standard in 405 stable glaucoma patients and ocular hypertensives. Agreement between and within the three centres was assessed using mean differences and intraclass correlation coefficients. Tolerance limits for a change in status at the level of individual pairs of measurements were also calculated.

RESULTS

Compared with a research clinic reference standard, measurements made by community optometrists and those made in the routine hospital eye service were similar. Mean measurement differences and variability were similar across all three groups compared for each of the test variables (IOP, cup to disc ratio, and visual field). Overall, the visual field was found to be the most reliable measurement and the cup to disc ratio the least.

CONCLUSIONS

Trained community optometrists are able to make reliable measurements of the factors important in the assessment of glaucoma patients and glaucoma suspects. This clinical ability should allow those optometrists with appropriate training to play a role in the monitoring of suitable patients.

摘要

背景/目的:原发性开角型青光眼患者和青光眼疑似患者占眼科门诊就诊人数的相当比例,需要终身随访。社区验光师可以接受适当培训以评估青光眼。这项随机对照试验旨在评估社区验光师监测这类患者的能力。

方法

社区验光师、医院眼科服务部门以及一家研究诊所参考“金标准”,对405例稳定的青光眼患者和高眼压症患者进行了杯盘比、视野评分和眼压测量。使用均值差异和组内相关系数评估三个中心之间以及中心内部的一致性。还计算了个体测量对水平上状态变化的公差限度。

结果

与研究诊所参考标准相比,社区验光师的测量结果与常规医院眼科服务部门的测量结果相似。对于每个测试变量(眼压、杯盘比和视野),所有三组的平均测量差异和变异性相似。总体而言,视野被认为是最可靠的测量指标,杯盘比是最不可靠的。

结论

经过培训的社区验光师能够对青光眼患者和青光眼疑似患者评估中重要的因素进行可靠测量。这种临床能力应使那些经过适当培训的验光师能够在监测合适患者方面发挥作用。

相似文献

1
The Bristol Shared Care Glaucoma Study: reliability of community optometric and hospital eye service test measures.布里斯托尔共享护理青光眼研究:社区验光和医院眼科服务检测措施的可靠性
Br J Ophthalmol. 1999 Jun;83(6):707-12. doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.6.707.
2
The Bristol Shared Care Glaucoma Study--validity of measurements and patient satisfaction.布里斯托尔共享护理青光眼研究——测量的有效性和患者满意度。
J Public Health Med. 1997 Dec;19(4):431-6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024673.
3
The Bristol shared care glaucoma study: outcome at follow up at 2 years.布里斯托尔共享护理青光眼研究:2年随访结果
Br J Ophthalmol. 2000 May;84(5):456-63. doi: 10.1136/bjo.84.5.456.
4
The Bristol Shared Care Glaucoma Study: study design.布里斯托尔共享护理青光眼研究:研究设计
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1995 Sep;15(5):391-4.
5
The Peterborough scheme for community specialist optometrists in glaucoma: results of 4 years of a two-tiered community-based assessment and follow-up service.彼得伯勒社区青光眼专科验光师计划:基于社区的两级评估和随访服务4年的结果
Curr Eye Res. 2015 Jul;40(7):690-6. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2014.957326. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
6
Do locally agreed guidelines for optometrists concerning the referral of glaucoma suspects influence referral practice?验光师关于青光眼疑似病例转诊的地方商定指南是否会影响转诊行为?
Eye (Lond). 2001 Aug;15(Pt 4):458-63. doi: 10.1038/eye.2001.155.
7
Can a community optometrist-based referral refinement scheme reduce false-positive glaucoma hospital referrals without compromising quality of care? The community and hospital allied network glaucoma evaluation scheme (CHANGES).社区视光师转诊修正方案能否在不影响护理质量的情况下减少青光眼医院转诊的假阳性?社区和医院联合网络青光眼评估方案(CHANGES)。
Eye (Lond). 2010 May;24(5):881-7. doi: 10.1038/eye.2009.190. Epub 2009 Jul 31.
8
Optic disc imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: variability and agreement study with Heidelberg retinal tomograph.频域光相干断层扫描视神经盘成像:海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪的可变性和一致性研究。
Ophthalmology. 2012 Sep;119(9):1852-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.02.033. Epub 2012 May 8.
9
Agreement between specially trained and accredited optometrists and glaucoma specialist consultant ophthalmologists in their management of glaucoma patients.经专门培训和认证的验光师与青光眼专家顾问眼科医生在青光眼患者管理方面的一致性。
Eye (Lond). 2012 Jun;26(6):853-61. doi: 10.1038/eye.2012.58. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
10
Outcomes of referrals by community optometrists to a hospital glaucoma service.社区验光师转诊至医院青光眼服务的结果。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Sep;89(9):1102-4. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.064378.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary Eyecare Glaucoma Service (PEGS): a mixed methods service evaluation.原发性眼保健青光眼服务(PEGS):一项混合方法的服务评估
Eye (Lond). 2024 Dec;38(18):3481-3487. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03335-3. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
2
The value of virtual glaucoma clinics: a review.虚拟青光眼诊所的价值:综述。
Eye (Lond). 2024 Jul;38(10):1840-1844. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03056-7. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
3
Patient-reported outcome and experience measures (POEM) of a community-based glaucoma clinic in Cambridge, UK: an observational study.英国剑桥社区青光眼诊所的患者报告结局和体验测量(POEM):一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 22;14(1):e077906. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077906.
4
Providing capacity in glaucoma care using trained and accredited optometrists: A qualitative evaluation.利用经过培训和认证的验光师提供青光眼护理服务:定性评估。
Eye (Lond). 2024 Apr;38(5):994-1004. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02820-5. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
5
Implementation and scalability of shared care models for chronic eye disease: a realist assessment informed by health system stakeholders in Finland, the United Kingdom, and Australia.慢性眼病共病管理模式的实施和可扩展性:基于芬兰、英国和澳大利亚卫生系统利益相关者的评估
Eye (Lond). 2023 Oct;37(14):2934-2945. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02444-9. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
6
Teleophthalmology and COVID-19: the patient perspective.远程眼科与2019冠状病毒病:患者视角
Future Healthc J. 2021 Mar;8(1):e54-e59. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2020-0139.
7
Evaluating the cost and wait-times of a task-sharing model of care for diabetic eye care: a case study from Australia.评估糖尿病眼部护理任务分担护理模式的成本和等待时间:来自澳大利亚的案例研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 5;10(10):e036842. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036842.
8
Improving Patient Access and Reducing Costs for Glaucoma with Integrated Hospital and Community Care: A Case Study from Australia.通过综合医院与社区护理改善青光眼患者的就医机会并降低成本:来自澳大利亚的案例研究
Int J Integr Care. 2019 Nov 6;19(4):5. doi: 10.5334/ijic.4642.
9
Advanced glaucoma at diagnosis: current perspectives.诊断时的晚期青光眼:当前的观点。
Eye (Lond). 2020 Jan;34(1):116-128. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0637-2. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
10
Glaucoma Specialist Optic Disc Margin, Rim Margin, and Rim Width Discordance in Glaucoma and Glaucoma Suspect Eyes.青光眼专家视神经盘边缘、边缘边缘和边缘宽度差异在青光眼和疑似青光眼眼中。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;192:65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.04.022. Epub 2018 May 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing costs of monitoring glaucoma patients: hospital ophthalmologists versus community optometrists.比较青光眼患者的监测成本:医院眼科医生与社区验光师
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997 Jan;2(1):19-25. doi: 10.1177/135581969700200106.
2
Variability in glaucomatous visual fields: implications for shared care schemes.青光眼视野的变异性:对共享照护方案的影响。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1998 Mar;18(2):120-5.
3
The Bristol Shared Care Glaucoma Study--validity of measurements and patient satisfaction.布里斯托尔共享护理青光眼研究——测量的有效性和患者满意度。
J Public Health Med. 1997 Dec;19(4):431-6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024673.
4
Number of people with glaucoma worldwide.全球青光眼患者人数。
Br J Ophthalmol. 1996 May;80(5):389-93. doi: 10.1136/bjo.80.5.389.
5
The Bristol Shared Care Glaucoma Study: study design.布里斯托尔共享护理青光眼研究:研究设计
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1995 Sep;15(5):391-4.
6
Detecting progressive visual field loss.检测进行性视野缺损。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1995 Sep;15(5):387-90.
7
The cost of monitoring glaucoma patients by community optometrists.社区验光师监测青光眼患者的成本。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1995 Sep;15(5):383-6.
8
Prevalence of glaucoma in the west of Ireland.爱尔兰西部青光眼的患病率。
Br J Ophthalmol. 1993 Jan;77(1):17-21. doi: 10.1136/bjo.77.1.17.
9
Errors in the diagnosis of visual field progression in normal-tension glaucoma.正常眼压性青光眼视野进展诊断中的误差
Ophthalmology. 1994 Sep;101(9):1589-94; discussion 1595. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31133-x.
10
The Framingham Eye Study monograph: An ophthalmological and epidemiological study of cataract, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, macular degeneration, and visual acuity in a general population of 2631 adults, 1973-1975.《弗雷明汉姆眼科研究专论》:对2631名成年人组成的普通人群进行的白内障、青光眼、糖尿病视网膜病变、黄斑变性及视力的眼科与流行病学研究,1973 - 1975年。
Surv Ophthalmol. 1980 May-Jun;24(Suppl):335-610.