Suppr超能文献

布里斯托尔共享护理青光眼研究:社区验光和医院眼科服务检测措施的可靠性

The Bristol Shared Care Glaucoma Study: reliability of community optometric and hospital eye service test measures.

作者信息

Spry P G, Spencer I C, Sparrow J M, Peters T J, Brookes S T, Gray S, Baker I, Furber J E, Easty D L

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bristol, Bristol.

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 1999 Jun;83(6):707-12. doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.6.707.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Primary open angle glaucoma patients and glaucoma suspects make up a considerable proportion of outpatient ophthalmological attendances and require lifelong review. Community optometrists can be suitably trained for assessment of glaucoma. This randomised controlled trial aims to assess the ability of community optometrists in the monitoring of this group of patients.

METHODS

Measures of cup to disc ratio, visual field score, and intraocular pressure were taken by community optometrists, the hospital eye service and a research clinic reference "gold" standard in 405 stable glaucoma patients and ocular hypertensives. Agreement between and within the three centres was assessed using mean differences and intraclass correlation coefficients. Tolerance limits for a change in status at the level of individual pairs of measurements were also calculated.

RESULTS

Compared with a research clinic reference standard, measurements made by community optometrists and those made in the routine hospital eye service were similar. Mean measurement differences and variability were similar across all three groups compared for each of the test variables (IOP, cup to disc ratio, and visual field). Overall, the visual field was found to be the most reliable measurement and the cup to disc ratio the least.

CONCLUSIONS

Trained community optometrists are able to make reliable measurements of the factors important in the assessment of glaucoma patients and glaucoma suspects. This clinical ability should allow those optometrists with appropriate training to play a role in the monitoring of suitable patients.

摘要

背景/目的:原发性开角型青光眼患者和青光眼疑似患者占眼科门诊就诊人数的相当比例,需要终身随访。社区验光师可以接受适当培训以评估青光眼。这项随机对照试验旨在评估社区验光师监测这类患者的能力。

方法

社区验光师、医院眼科服务部门以及一家研究诊所参考“金标准”,对405例稳定的青光眼患者和高眼压症患者进行了杯盘比、视野评分和眼压测量。使用均值差异和组内相关系数评估三个中心之间以及中心内部的一致性。还计算了个体测量对水平上状态变化的公差限度。

结果

与研究诊所参考标准相比,社区验光师的测量结果与常规医院眼科服务部门的测量结果相似。对于每个测试变量(眼压、杯盘比和视野),所有三组的平均测量差异和变异性相似。总体而言,视野被认为是最可靠的测量指标,杯盘比是最不可靠的。

结论

经过培训的社区验光师能够对青光眼患者和青光眼疑似患者评估中重要的因素进行可靠测量。这种临床能力应使那些经过适当培训的验光师能够在监测合适患者方面发挥作用。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
The value of virtual glaucoma clinics: a review.虚拟青光眼诊所的价值:综述。
Eye (Lond). 2024 Jul;38(10):1840-1844. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03056-7. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
9
Advanced glaucoma at diagnosis: current perspectives.诊断时的晚期青光眼:当前的观点。
Eye (Lond). 2020 Jan;34(1):116-128. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0637-2. Epub 2019 Nov 18.

本文引用的文献

4
Number of people with glaucoma worldwide.全球青光眼患者人数。
Br J Ophthalmol. 1996 May;80(5):389-93. doi: 10.1136/bjo.80.5.389.
6
8
Prevalence of glaucoma in the west of Ireland.爱尔兰西部青光眼的患病率。
Br J Ophthalmol. 1993 Jan;77(1):17-21. doi: 10.1136/bjo.77.1.17.
9
Errors in the diagnosis of visual field progression in normal-tension glaucoma.正常眼压性青光眼视野进展诊断中的误差
Ophthalmology. 1994 Sep;101(9):1589-94; discussion 1595. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31133-x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验