• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性眼病共病管理模式的实施和可扩展性:基于芬兰、英国和澳大利亚卫生系统利益相关者的评估

Implementation and scalability of shared care models for chronic eye disease: a realist assessment informed by health system stakeholders in Finland, the United Kingdom, and Australia.

机构信息

The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, 1 King Street Newtown, Sydney, NSW, 2042, Australia.

Westmead Hospital Ophthalmology Department, Corner Hawkesbury and Darcy Rd Westmead, Sydney, NSW, 2145, Australia.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 2023 Oct;37(14):2934-2945. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02444-9. Epub 2023 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1038/s41433-023-02444-9
PMID:36879159
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10517111/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Several health systems have implemented innovative models of care which share the management of patients with chronic eye diseases between ophthalmologists and optometrists. These models have demonstrated positive outcomes for health systems including increased access for patients, service efficiency and cost-savings. This study aims to understand factors which support successful implementation and scalability of these models of care.

SUBJECTS/METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 key health system stakeholders (clinicians, managers, administrators, policy-makers) in Finland, United Kingdom and Australia between October 2018 and February 2020. Data were analyzed using a realist framework to identify the contexts, mechanisms of action, and outcomes of sustained and emerging shared care schemes.

RESULTS

Five key themes relating to successful implementation of shared care were identified as (1) clinician-led solutions, (2) redistributing teams, (3) building inter-disciplinary trust, (4) using evidence for buy-in, and (5) standardized care protocols. Scalability was found to be supported by (6) financial incentives, (7) integrated information systems, (8) local governance, and (9) a need for evidence of longer-term health and economic benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

The themes and program theories presented in this paper should be considered when testing and scaling shared eye care schemes to optimize benefits and promote sustainability.

摘要

背景/目的:一些卫生系统已经实施了创新的护理模式,这些模式将眼科医生和验光师共同管理慢性眼病患者。这些模式已经证明对卫生系统有积极的影响,包括增加患者的就诊机会、提高服务效率和节省成本。本研究旨在了解支持这些护理模式成功实施和可扩展性的因素。

方法

2018 年 10 月至 2020 年 2 月期间,在芬兰、英国和澳大利亚,对 21 名关键卫生系统利益相关者(临床医生、经理、管理人员、政策制定者)进行了半结构式访谈。使用现实主义框架对数据进行分析,以确定持续和新兴的共享护理计划的背景、作用机制和结果。

结果

确定了与共享护理成功实施相关的五个关键主题,分别是(1)临床医生主导的解决方案,(2)重新分配团队,(3)建立跨学科信任,(4)使用证据获得认可,(5)标准化护理方案。可扩展性得到了以下因素的支持:(6)经济激励,(7)集成信息系统,(8)地方治理,以及(9)需要有更长期的健康和经济效益证据。

结论

在测试和扩展共享眼科护理计划以优化效益和促进可持续性时,应考虑本文提出的主题和方案理论。

相似文献

1
Implementation and scalability of shared care models for chronic eye disease: a realist assessment informed by health system stakeholders in Finland, the United Kingdom, and Australia.慢性眼病共病管理模式的实施和可扩展性:基于芬兰、英国和澳大利亚卫生系统利益相关者的评估
Eye (Lond). 2023 Oct;37(14):2934-2945. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02444-9. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Mechanisms of scaling up: combining a realist perspective and systems analysis to understand successfully scaled interventions.规模化的机制:结合现实主义视角和系统分析来理解成功规模化的干预措施。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Mar 22;18(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01103-0.
4
Shared care for chronic eye diseases: perspectives of ophthalmologists, optometrists and patients.慢性眼病的共同护理:眼科医生、验光师和患者的观点。
Med J Aust. 2012 Jun 4;196(10):646-50. doi: 10.5694/mja11.10856.
5
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
6
Integration of hospital and community care for paediatric ophthalmology: A mixed-methods study.医院与社区儿童眼科医疗服务整合:一项混合方法研究。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2023 Sep;43(5):997-1006. doi: 10.1111/opo.13160. Epub 2023 May 7.
7
Towards achieving interorganisational collaboration between health-care providers: a realist evidence synthesis.实现医疗机构间合作的途径:一项基于实际证据的系统综述。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jun;11(6):1-130. doi: 10.3310/KPLT1423.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
The role of Government policy in supporting nurse-led care in general practice in the United Kingdom, New Zealand and Australia: an adapted realist review.政府政策在支持英国、新西兰和澳大利亚的全科医疗中护士主导护理的作用:一项适应性真实主义综述。
J Adv Nurs. 2012 May;68(5):963-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05870.x. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
10
Realist evaluation of allied health management in Queensland: what works, in which contexts and why.昆士兰联合健康管理的现实主义评估:哪些措施有效、在何种背景下有效以及原因何在。
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Aug;43(4):466-473. doi: 10.1071/AH17265.

引用本文的文献

1
Frailty Focus: Empowering Rural Health With Advanced Nurse Practitioners: A Discussion Paper.脆弱性聚焦:借助高级执业护士增强农村医疗服务:一篇讨论文件
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Apr;31(3):e70075. doi: 10.1111/jep.70075.
2
Providing capacity in glaucoma care using trained and accredited optometrists: A qualitative evaluation.利用经过培训和认证的验光师提供青光眼护理服务:定性评估。
Eye (Lond). 2024 Apr;38(5):994-1004. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02820-5. Epub 2023 Nov 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the cost and wait-times of a task-sharing model of care for diabetic eye care: a case study from Australia.评估糖尿病眼部护理任务分担护理模式的成本和等待时间:来自澳大利亚的案例研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 5;10(10):e036842. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036842.
2
Evaluation of a hospital-based integrated model of eye care for diabetic retinopathy assessment: a multimethod study.基于医院的糖尿病视网膜病变评估眼科综合护理模式评价:一项多方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 30;10(4):e034699. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034699.
3
Big data and the eyeSmart electronic medical record system - An 8-year experience from a three-tier eye care network in India.大数据与眼智电子病历系统——来自印度三级眼保健网络的八年经验
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar;68(3):427-432. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_710_19.
4
Impact of referral refinement on management of glaucoma suspects in Australia.转诊优化对澳大利亚青光眼疑似患者管理的影响。
Clin Exp Optom. 2020 Sep;103(5):675-683. doi: 10.1111/cxo.13030. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
5
Improving Patient Access and Reducing Costs for Glaucoma with Integrated Hospital and Community Care: A Case Study from Australia.通过综合医院与社区护理改善青光眼患者的就医机会并降低成本:来自澳大利亚的案例研究
Int J Integr Care. 2019 Nov 6;19(4):5. doi: 10.5334/ijic.4642.
6
Estimated number of ophthalmologists worldwide (International Council of Ophthalmology update): will we meet the needs?全球眼科医生数量估计(国际眼科理事会更新):我们能否满足需求?
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr;104(4):588-592. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314336. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
7
A validation study of the Australian Maternity Care Classification System.澳大利亚产时护理分类系统的验证研究。
Women Birth. 2019 Jun;32(3):204-212. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.08.161. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
8
Bridging the human resource gap in surgical and anesthesia care in low-resource countries: a review of the task sharing literature.填补资源匮乏国家外科和麻醉护理人力资源缺口:任务分担文献综述。
Hum Resour Health. 2017 Nov 7;15(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12960-017-0248-6.
9
Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990-2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全球失明和远距离视力损伤原因 1990-2020:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Dec;5(12):e1221-e1234. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30393-5. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
10
Impact of information and communication technology on interprofessional collaboration for chronic disease management: a systematic review.信息通信技术对慢性病管理中跨专业协作的影响:一项系统综述
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2017 Oct;22(4):250-257. doi: 10.1177/1355819617714292. Epub 2017 Jun 6.