Ruperto N, Ravelli A, Falcini F, Lepore L, Buoncompagni A, Gerloni V, Bardare M, Cortis E, Zulian F, Sardella M L, Giovanni Strano C, Alessio M, Alpigiani M G, Migliavacca D, Pistorio A, Viola S, Martini A
Laboratorio di Informatica Medica, IRCCS S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999 Feb;38(2):176-80. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/38.2.176.
To examine the responsiveness of the disease activity measures more commonly used in juvenile chronic arthritis (JCA) clinical trials.
Data were obtained from an open-label, non-controlled, multicentre trial designed to investigate the efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) in children with JCA. Outcome measures, including physician and parent global assessments, functional ability measures, articular variables, and laboratory indicators of systemic inflammation, were assessed at baseline and after 6 months of MTX treatment in 132 patients. Responsiveness of endpoint variables was evaluated by assessing the effect size (ES) and the standardized response median (SRM).
Physician and parent global assessments were the more responsive instruments, showing ES and SRM above 1.0. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, functional status measures and articular variables showed intermediate responsiveness. Morning stiffness, haemoglobin and platelet count were the least responsive instruments.
The results of our analysis indicate that subjective estimations of the disease activity, either by the physician or parents, are the most responsive instruments in the assessment of the therapeutic response in children with JCA. The responsiveness of outcome measures in JCA should be further investigated in prospective controlled studies.
检验青少年慢性关节炎(JCA)临床试验中更常用的疾病活动度测量指标的反应性。
数据来自一项开放标签、非对照、多中心试验,该试验旨在研究甲氨蝶呤(MTX)对JCA患儿的疗效。在132例患者的基线期以及MTX治疗6个月后,评估了包括医生和家长的整体评估、功能能力测量指标、关节变量以及全身炎症的实验室指标等结局指标。通过评估效应量(ES)和标准化反应中位数(SRM)来评价终点变量的反应性。
医生和家长的整体评估是反应性更强的指标,ES和SRM均高于1.0。红细胞沉降率、C反应蛋白、功能状态测量指标和关节变量显示出中等反应性。晨僵、血红蛋白和血小板计数是反应性最弱的指标。
我们的分析结果表明,医生或家长对疾病活动度的主观评估是评估JCA患儿治疗反应中反应性最强的指标。JCA结局指标的反应性应在前瞻性对照研究中进一步探究。